Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Tibetan Religious Dances: Tibetan Text and Annotated Translation of the Chams Yig

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Rene de Nebesky-Wojkowitz studied Tibetan religious culture in the Himalayan region before his early death, and this Mouton book, published posthumously and edited by Christoph von Furer-Haimendorf, is his translation and study of a Tibetan chams yig, a monastic dance manual, with detailed instructions for cham, the ritual masked dances. Verified as a genuine and still cited scholarly work, its strength is that it works from the tradition's own written choreographic instructions rather than from outside observation alone, explaining the striking uniformity of cham performance across monasteries and periods. Its limit is that it documents one specific dance manual's instructions, so a claim about how a different monastery's cham tradition actually varies from this text needs a source addressing that particular tradition.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published posthumously by Mouton as Rene de Nebesky-Wojkowitz's scholarly translation and study, edited by Christoph von Furer-Haimendorf, working from the tradition's own written choreographic instructions, treated at the top tier as that standard scholarly work.
Notes
A study and translation of a monastic dance manual, published after the author's death. The standard scholarly treatment of cham, describing the masks, the sequence and the ritual purpose of the dance from the tradition's own written instructions rather than from observation alone.
Citation
Author
Rene de Nebesky-Wojkowitz
Publisher
Mouton
Publication Year
1976
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Dances, 10 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Denominations, 6 claims: 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.