Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Tituba, Reluctant Witch of Salem: Devilish Indians and Puritan Fantasies

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Elaine G. Breslaw is a historian, and this New York University Press book is her academic study of Tituba, the enslaved woman at the center of the Salem witchcraft accusations, focusing specifically on the long disputed question of her actual ethnic and geographic origin. Its strength is archival correction, Breslaw traces how Tituba's origin was persistently misrepresented in later popular and even some scholarly retellings, and builds a documented case for a different origin than the one most commonly repeated, treating the question as a real historical puzzle rather than settled trivia. Its limit is that Breslaw's specific conclusion about Tituba's origin, while the standard scholarly treatment, rests on inference from indirect colonial era records rather than a document that states her origin outright, so it should be presented as the best supported reading rather than an unchallengeable certainty.

Facts
Citation
Author
Elaine G. Breslaw
Publisher
New York University Press
Publication Year
1996
URL
https://archive.org/details/titubareluctantw0000bres
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Elaine Breslaw's New York University Press standard study of Tituba and the question of her origin.
Notes
The standard study of Tituba and of the question of her origin.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

New York, Cities

This source names New York directly: "Breslaw is a historian, and this New York University Press book is her academic study of Tituba, the enslaved woman at the center of the Salem witchcraft accusations, focusing specifically on the..."

Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)

This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected, 3 open question. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Open Questions, 18 claims: 14 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 2 open question, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 1 general references.
  • States & Territories, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Popular myth - corrected

1

Historical Figures

Open question

3

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.