Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

Court Decision

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), is the United States Supreme Court decision striking down a Maryland religious test for holding public office. Justice Hugo L. Black's opinion for the Court included a footnote naming Secular Humanism among religions that, in the United States, do not teach a belief in the existence of God, a line frequently cited on both sides of the ongoing debate over whether organized humanism's own foundational declarations, including the Humanist Manifesto series, amount to a religion. It is cited here as the primary legal source for that footnote and the debate it continues to generate.

Facts
Citation
Author
Supreme Court of the United States (Justice Hugo L. Black, writing for the majority)
Publisher
Supreme Court of the United States; reported at 367 U.S. 488
Publication Year
1961
URL
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/367/488/
Source Type
Case law
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
An official published opinion of the United States Supreme Court; the primary legal record of the footnote it is cited for.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Maryland directly: "Supreme Court decision striking down a Maryland religious test for holding public office."

Source Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)Supreme Court of the United States (Justice Hugo L. Black, writing for the majority)

This source names Secular Humanism directly: "Black's opinion for the Court included a footnote naming Secular Humanism among religions that, in the United States, do not teach a belief in the existence of God, a line frequently cited on both..."

Source Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)Supreme Court of the United States (Justice Hugo L. Black, writing for the majority)
Sources
Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)
Supreme Court of the United States (Justice Hugo L. Black, writing for the majority), Supreme Court of the United States; reported at 367 U.S. 488, 1961View the Source
Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)

This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Literary Works, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

General References

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.