Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Virtue Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is the Virtue Ethics entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, written by Rosalind Hursthouse, a leading virtue ethicist, and later revised with Glen Pettigrove, published and maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. Its authority comes from the Encyclopedia's editorial model: named specialist authors writing signed entries that are peer reviewed on publication and then kept current through dated substantive revisions, a stronger process than an open wiki even though both are freely available online. First published in 2003 and revised as recently as May 2026, it tracks an active philosophical debate rather than freezing it at one moment. Its limit is that it summarizes the major positions and their critics rather than arguing a single original thesis, so a claim about one philosopher's specific argument is best checked against that philosopher's own text.

Facts
Citation
Author
Rosalind Hursthouse and Glen Pettigrove
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on virtue ethics, a maintained peer reviewed academic reference with named, credentialed authors and dated revisions, rather than a crowd-edited tertiary source.
Notes
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published July 18, 2003; last substantive revision May 3, 2026, author and dates confirmed directly against the entry.
Claims Backed By This Source (76 claims)

This source backs 76 claims across the atlas. As facts: 55 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 6 connected. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Virtues, 50 claims: 34 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 4 connected, 7 general references.
  • Doctrines, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Articles, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.