Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wael Hallaq's Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?, published in the International Journal of Middle East Studies in 1984, is a peer-reviewed article that examined the classical Islamic legal literature directly and argued that no formal consensus ever closed the gate of independent legal reasoning, and that jurists continued to be recognized as mujtahids well after the point the closure narrative claims. Its strength is that it is grounded in the primary legal sources rather than repeating the received account. Its limit is that it is one influential article in an ongoing scholarly debate, so the traditional closed-gate narrative should not be repeated as settled fact, but Hallaq's revisionist reading should not be treated as unanimous consensus either.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in the International Journal of Middle East Studies, a peer reviewed academic journal, Wael B. Hallaq's scholarly article on Islamic legal history.
Notes
Argued from the legal literature that no consensus ever closed the gate and that mujtahids continued to be recognised. The received closed-gate account should not be repeated as settled fact.
Citation
Author
Wael B. Hallaq
Publisher
International Journal of Middle East Studies 16:1
Publication Year
1984
Source Type
Journal article
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 connected, 3 held Differently. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 9 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 3 general references.
  • Doctrines, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Schools of Religious Law, 6 claims: 3 held Differently, 3 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 holds.

Scholarly debate

3

Held Differently

3
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.