Why the Nebra Sky Disc Dates to the Early Bronze Age, An Overview of the Interdisciplinary Results, by Ernst Pernicka and coauthors in the peer reviewed journal Archaeologia Austriaca in 2020, is the research team's own consolidated response reaffirming the disc's early Bronze Age date and archaeological context after public disputes over its authenticity and dating had circulated. Its authority rests on standard peer review and on presenting interdisciplinary evidence, metallurgical, archaeological and contextual, from the team with direct access to the object and its find circumstances, rather than a single line of argument. Its limit is that it is the excavating and analysing team's own defense of its conclusions in an ongoing scholarly dispute, so a reader following the full controversy should also be aware that the disc's authenticity and precise context have been challenged by other researchers, a debate this article addresses but does not by itself end for every skeptic.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Ernst Pernicka and coauthors' Why the Nebra Sky Disc Dates to the Early Bronze Age, An Overview of the Interdisciplinary Results, published in the peer reviewed journal Archaeologia Austriaca in 2020, the top tier reflecting standard peer review and interdisciplinary metallurgical, archaeological and contextual evidence from the team with direct access to the object and its find circumstances, notwithstanding that it is the excavating and analysing team's own defense of its conclusions in an ongoing scholarly dispute over the disc's authenticity and precise context that other researchers have challenged. NotesPeer-reviewed interdisciplinary study dating the Nebra Sky Disc to the early Bronze Age, Archaeologia Austriaca, 2020.
Citation
AuthorErnst Pernicka and others
PublisherArchaeologia Austriaca 104
Publication Year2020
URLhttps://austriaca.at/?arp=0x003bfe98
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Metals, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.