Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Fita Ⱚ

Glagolitic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Devised about 863 CE for the Moravian mission of Constantine the Philosopher, later Saint Cyril, and his brother Methodius

Fita is the forty-second letter of Glagolitic and corresponds to Greek theta. Slavonic had no interdental fricative, so the letter is used only in words and names taken from Greek, where it is read as f or as t depending on period and region, and its name is itself the Slavonic reading of the Greek letter name theta. It sits with izhitsa at the end of the alphabet among the signs kept for Greek spelling rather than for Slavonic sound, and both letters were carried into Church Slavonic orthography and were removed from Russian only by the reform of 1918. Because it writes no Slavonic sound of its own, the letter is a reliable marker of a Greek loanword wherever it turns up in a Slavonic text.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
Devised about 863 CE for the Moravian mission of Constantine the Philosopher, later Saint Cyril, and his brother Methodius 2
Place of Origin
Byzantium and Great Moravia; the letters were made in Constantinople or Thessalonica and carried north for the mission 2
Origin of the Name
The Slavonic reading of the Greek letter name theta, taken over along with the letter to spell Greek words correctly. 1
Sense of the Name
Names the borrowed Greek letter theta itself rather than an independent Slavonic word; the sense is the name of the letter it transliterates, nothing more. 1
Identity
Script Type
An alphabet: each letter writes a single sound, consonant or vowel, with no inherent vowel and no vowel diacritics 1
Position
The forty-third letter of the Glagolitic alphabet in the traditional order 1Tradition: The Glagolitic alphabet of Old Church Slavonic
Attributions
Associated Sound
The Greek theta, read in Slavonic as f or as t 1Tradition: The Glagolitic alphabet of Old Church Slavonic
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Fita and izhitsa are the two signs kept in Church Slavonic orthography purely for Greek spelling, and both were removed from Russian only by the spelling reform of 1918, so the letter's presence in a word is a reliable sign that the word came from Greek. 1
Learn More
Fita: The Glagolitic Letter

Fita answers to Greek theta and exists to spell Greek words and names correctly. It carries no numeral value in the Glagolitic system, standing past the end of the counted series, although its Cyrillic counterpart does carry one.

Slavonic had no sound corresponding to Greek theta, and by the ninth century Greek itself pronounced the letter as a fricative that Slavonic speakers approximated in various ways. The letter therefore does not record a Slavonic sound at all. It records a Greek spelling, and its function is to let a Slavonic scribe write a Greek name in a form a reader could match against the Greek book it came from.

That is a real function in a translation culture. The scriptures, the liturgy and the theological vocabulary all came into Slavonic from Greek, and the proper names in them are numerous and had to be got right. An alphabet without this letter would have had to approximate every one of them.

Its presence in a word is therefore a reliable sign of Greek origin. No native Slavonic word needs it, and a scribe who used it in one had made an error or a deliberate learned gesture.

The letter therefore belongs with the small group of signs whose Greek ancestry is not in dispute. Whatever is argued about where the Glagolitic letterforms came from in general, this one answers to a particular Greek letter by function, occupies its place in the order for that reason, and is used for the words that came from Greek. The atlas records that correspondence as attested and keeps the question of the letterform separate.

Fita and Its Cyrillic Counterpart

Cyrillic fita writes the same borrowed Greek letter for the same purpose and takes the numeral nine, which is the value of Greek theta. Glagolitic gives it no value at all, having stopped counting several letters earlier when its own sequence ran out.

That single difference sums up the two numeral systems. Cyrillic numbers by asking what Greek letter stands in the slot, so a letter borrowed directly from Greek naturally keeps the Greek number, wherever in the Slavonic order it happens to sit. Glagolitic numbers by counting its own letters from the beginning, so a letter that falls after the twenty fifth position gets nothing, whatever its Greek ancestry. Two different questions, two different answers, and the same letter.

The letters that serve Greek spelling rather than Slavonic sound are the small group in which a derivation from Greek is not in dispute. Whatever is decided about the shapes of the Slavonic letters in general, this sign answers to Greek theta by function, in both scripts, and the atlas records that correspondence as attested. The separate question of where the Glagolitic letterform came from is recorded separately and marked debated, because the two questions have different answers and different evidence.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Derived From

Fita exists to write Greek theta in Greek words and names. Slavonic had no such sound, so the letter records a Greek spelling rather than a Slavonic one, and its presence in a word is a reliable sign that the word came in from Greek. Where the Glagolitic letterform came from is a separate question and is recorded separately.

Source The World's Writing SystemsPeter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.)

Originates in Language

Glagolitic was devised in the 860s so that Greek scripture and liturgy could be read in Slavonic, and Fita belongs to the alphabet of Old Church Slavonic, the language of that translation and of the earliest Slavonic books.

Related To

Cyrillic fita answers to Glagolitic fita, the sign each script keeps for Greek theta. In Glagolitic it stands outside the numeral series.

Source Old Church Slavonic GrammarHorace G. Lunt
Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996on the Slavic alphabets, their letters and their numeral systemsView the Source
2. Byzantine Missions Among the Slavs: SS. Constantine-Cyril and Methodius
Francis Dvornik, Rutgers University Press, 1970on the Moravian mission and the making of the Slavic lettersView the Source
The Unicode Standard
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Consortiumon the encoded characters, their names and their block assignmentView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.