Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Alphabet Letters

Sou ⲋ

SOO
Coptic Letters

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin Coptic is the last stage of the Egyptian language, not a separate tongue

Sou is the sixth sign of the Coptic alphabet and it writes no sound at all. It is a numeral, worth six, inherited from the Greek alphabetic numeral system, which needed a sign in the sixth position because the old letter digamma had dropped out of the spoken alphabet while its numeral value survived; in Greek manuscripts that sign is usually called stigma. Coptic took over the whole Greek numeral series, sou included, so Coptic alphabet charts list it in its numerical place between ei and zeta even though no Coptic word contains it. It is a useful reminder that an alphabet and a number series are two different things that happen to share a set of shapes, and that a script can carry a sign for centuries purely because the counting needs it.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Period
Greek letters wrote Egyptian from about the first century CE, settled by the fourth 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) surveys the small corpus of Old Coptic texts, pre-Christian magical and astrological papyri in which Egyptian was first written out using Greek letters plus a few signs borrowed from Demotic, against the standardised Coptic used in Christian scripture translation from around the third century CE onward. Comparing the two corpora, its contributors find the evidence thin enough to support two readings: that the Old Coptic magical texts already fixed the practice of writing Egyptian in Greek-based letters, or that the Christian translation project, needing a stable and teachable orthography for scripture, was the decisive act that standardised the script that survives. Because both readings draw on the same handful of surviving texts and no source describes an official act of decision, the volume treats the question as open rather than favouring either camp.
Origins
Origin Period
Coptic is the last stage of the Egyptian language, not a separate tongue 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Place of Origin
Egypt, where Greek letters were taken up to write the Egyptian language 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Origin of the Name
Coptic kept the Greek letter names, reshaped by Egyptian speech 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Origin of the Name
The Greek numeral sign in the sixth place, called stigma, standing for the lost digamma 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Sense of the Name
hook (through the Greek numeral sign stigma, itself from digamma) 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
The pictographic sense is a modern reconstruction from the letter name rather than a meaning attested in the script's own period, and the atlas records that position elsewhere on this letter. The name itself is inherited; the picture behind it is inferred.
Identity
Script Type
An alphabet: each letter writes a single sound, consonant or vowel; twenty-four of its thirty-two letters are the Greek uncial alphabet taken over directly, and the remaining letters, drawn from Demotic Egyptian sign-forms, write Egyptian consonants Greek had no letters for. 1
Position
Sixth sign of the Coptic alphabet in the numeral series, between ei and zeta; it is not a letter of the spoken language and writes no sound 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
A numeral sign worth 6 that writes no sound and occurs in no Coptic word 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Alphabet of 32 letters in Bohairic, 31 in Sahidic, which lacks khai 2Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Koppa and sampi serve 90 and 900 on the same footing, as figures not letters 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt
Learn More
Sou: The Coptic Numeral Sign (Value 6), from Greek Stigma

Sou is the sixth sign of the Coptic alphabet and writes no sound whatever. It exists because Coptic took over the Greek alphabetic numeral system, and that system had a problem in its sixth position. The oldest Greek alphabet contained a letter, digamma, which fell out of use as a sound in most Greek dialects long before the classical period, but its numeral value of six survived in the counting series because dropping it would have shifted every value after it. Greek scribes went on writing a sign in that place, which in the manuscript tradition merged with the ligature called stigma.

Coptic inherited the arrangement complete, so Coptic alphabet charts list sou between ei and zeta, and Coptic scribes wrote it whenever they needed the figure six. No Coptic word contains it. The sign is a clean demonstration that an alphabet and a numeral series are two systems that happen to share a set of shapes, and that the two can come apart. Greek needed two further signs of the same kind to cover ninety and nine hundred, koppa and sampi, and those too are numeral signs rather than letters, appearing in Coptic manuscripts where a number requires them but never in a Coptic word. Coptic charts vary in whether they print them in the alphabet at all, which is a matter of editorial convention rather than of dispute about the script.

Sou and How Coptic Manuscripts Count

Numbers do a great deal of work in a Coptic manuscript. Quires are numbered so a binder can assemble them, folios and pages are numbered, chapters and scriptural divisions are numbered, dates are written out, and the Coptic calendar with its thirteen months requires figures constantly. All of this was done with letters rather than with a separate set of digits, in the alphabetic system Coptic took from Greek: the first nine letters count the units, the next nine the tens, the next nine the hundreds. That arrangement requires twenty seven signs, and the Greek alphabet in ordinary use has only twenty four, which is why sou and two further numeral only signs exist.

Coptic scribes distinguished a letter used as a figure by drawing a stroke above it, so a reader met no ambiguity even where a numeral stood in the middle of running text. The same convention marks the abbreviated sacred names Coptic inherited from Greek Christian book practice, and the two uses are told apart by context. The system has one further consequence that shaped how numbers were thought about across the Christian and Jewish east: because every letter carried a value, every written word carried a total. Greek writers called the practice of summing those totals isopsephy, and Hebrew tradition calls the equivalent gematria. Coptic possessed the same mechanism by inheritance, and the alphabet chart with sou in its sixth place is where the mechanism starts.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Related To

Ei carries five and sou six, so the two stand together in the numeral series although only one of them writes a sound. Sou is a numeral sign rather than a letter, and no Coptic word contains it.

Sou holds the numeral value six and writes no sound, which is why zeta, the sign after it, carries seven. Coptic took the Greek alphabetic numerals over as a complete system, including the position no Greek letter had occupied as a sound since well before the classical period.

Sources
1. The World's Writing Systems
Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds.), Oxford University Press, 1996View the Source
2. A Coptic Grammar, with Chrestomathy and Glossary: Sahidic Dialect
Bentley Layton, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2004View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.