Alphabet Letters
Coptic Letters
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin Coptic is the last stage of the Egyptian language, not a separate tongue
Upsilon is the twenty first letter of the Coptic alphabet and carries the numeral value four hundred. The name is the Greek one, and this atlas uses it because the Coptic name for the letter is given differently by different authorities: scholarly grammars of Sahidic record a Coptic form, while alphabet charts in Coptic Orthodox use commonly print another, and the run that seeded these rows could not settle which to prefer. The letter itself is not in doubt. It writes the second element of the digraph that Coptic uses for the u vowel, following ou, exactly as Greek does, and it also appears in Greek loanwords in its own right. Scribes marked it with two dots above where it needed to be read as its own syllable rather than as part of a preceding diphthong, the same device Coptic uses on iota, and that mark is a reading aid rather than a change of sound.
Facts
Attributions
Associated SoundContributes to the u vowel as the second element of the digraph ou; alone, in Greek loanwords, it keeps the Greek upsilon value 1 Disputed
Origin PeriodGreek letters wrote Egyptian from about the first century CE, settled by the fourth 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt The World's Writing Systems (Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, eds., Oxford University Press, 1996) surveys the small corpus of Old Coptic texts, pre-Christian magical and astrological papyri in which Egyptian was first written out using Greek letters plus a few signs borrowed from Demotic, against the standardised Coptic used in Christian scripture translation from around the third century CE onward. Comparing the two corpora, its contributors find the evidence thin enough to support two readings: that the Old Coptic magical texts already fixed the practice of writing Egyptian in Greek-based letters, or that the Christian translation project, needing a stable and teachable orthography for scripture, was the decisive act that standardised the script that survives. Because both readings draw on the same handful of surviving texts and no source describes an official act of decision, the volume treats the question as open rather than favouring either camp. Origins
Origin PeriodCoptic is the last stage of the Egyptian language, not a separate tongue 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Place of OriginEgypt, where Greek letters were taken up to write the Egyptian language 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Origin of the NameCoptic kept the Greek letter names, reshaped by Egyptian speech 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Origin of the NameGreek upsilon; the Coptic name is given differently by different authorities 2Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Sense of the Namehook (through Greek upsilon, from Phoenician waw) 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt The pictographic sense is a modern reconstruction from the letter name rather than a meaning attested in the script's own period, and the atlas records that position elsewhere on this letter. The name itself is inherited; the picture behind it is inferred. Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceAlphabet of 32 letters in Bohairic, 31 in Sahidic, which lacks khai 2Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Meaning in the Attesting SourceSecond element of the digraph ou, which writes the u vowel 2Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Meaning in the Attesting SourceValue 400 in the Coptic numeral series 1Tradition: The Coptic alphabet of Christian Egypt Identity
Script TypeAn alphabet: each letter writes a single sound, consonant or vowel; twenty-four of its thirty-two letters are the Greek uncial alphabet taken over directly, and the remaining letters, drawn from Demotic Egyptian sign-forms, write Egyptian consonants Greek had no letters for. 1 PositionTwenty-first of the thirty-two letters of the Coptic alphabet, carrying the numeral value four hundred 1 Open Questions
AlphabetCoptic renamed several Greek letters, but for the letter taken from upsilon the authorities disagree on the Coptic form: scholarly grammars of Sahidic record one form and alphabet charts in ordinary Coptic Orthodox use commonly print another. The Greek name is used in the meantime as a neutral label.
Coptic renames ei for epsilon, laula for lambda, ou for omicron and semma for sigma without dispute, but the Coptic name for the letter from upsilon has no settled form: Sahidic scholarly grammars and living Bohairic church-school usage do not agree, and this pass could not establish which had the better claim without asserting something it had not checked. Learn More
Upsilon: The Coptic Letter (Value 400), from Greek Upsilon
Upsilon is the twenty first letter of the Coptic alphabet and carries the numeral value four hundred. This atlas names it with the Greek name deliberately. Coptic renamed several of the Greek letters, and for this one the authorities do not agree: scholarly grammars of the Sahidic dialect record one Coptic form of the name, alphabet charts in ordinary Coptic Orthodox use commonly print another, and the run that wrote these rows could not establish which had the better claim without asserting something it had not verified. The Greek name is used here as a neutral label and the disagreement is recorded rather than resolved.
Nothing about the letter itself is unclear. It writes the second element of the digraph Coptic uses for the u vowel, following ou, exactly as Greek does, and it appears independently in Greek loanwords. Scribes marked it with two dots above where it had to be read as beginning its own syllable rather than joining the vowel in front of it, a device Coptic also uses on iota and took from Greek manuscript practice. The mark is a reading aid and changes nothing about the sound. In the numeral series upsilon is worth four hundred, and it belongs to the run of hundreds that ro opens.
Upsilon and the Vowels Coptic Writes with Two Letters
Coptic does not have a letter for every vowel it pronounces. It has the Greek vowel letters, and for the u sound it uses a digraph, the two letters ou written in sequence, exactly as Greek did by the period when Coptic was formed. That is a straightforward inheritance rather than a compromise, since Greek itself had long written the sound that way, but it has consequences for reading. A beginner who has learned that ou is worth seventy and upsilon four hundred meets the two letters together writing a single vowel and has to recognise that a digraph is one unit. The same difficulty arises with the diphthongs Coptic spells out letter by letter, which is why the two dots above a vowel matter: they are the signal that the letters are not to be taken together.
All of this sits inside the larger point about what the Greek alphabet gave Egyptian. The older Egyptian scripts wrote no vowels at all, so the question of how to spell a u never arose. Coptic had to answer it, and answered it by taking the Greek solution whole, along with the Greek reading aids that make the solution workable. The seven letters brought in from Demotic answer a different set of questions, about consonants Greek could not write, and the alphabet as it stands is the sum of both answers.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
Taken over as a shape and a value, including the digraph that writes u
Related To
Coptic Upsilon is the Greek upsilon, forming the second element of the ou digraph in both scripts; both carry the numeral value 400.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
What is the Coptic name of the letter taken from Greek upsilon?
Coptic renamed several of the Greek letters, and this atlas uses the Coptic names where they are settled: ei for epsilon, laula for lambda, ou for omicron, semma for sigma. For upsilon the authorities disagree. Scholarly grammars of the Sahidic dialect record one Coptic form, alphabet charts in ordinary Coptic Orthodox use commonly print another, and the run that seeded these rows could not establish which had the better claim without asserting something it had not checked. The Greek name is used in the meantime as a neutral label.
What would resolve this A survey of the letter names given in the principal Coptic grammars alongside the names taught in Coptic Orthodox church schools in Egypt and the diaspora, distinguishing the scholarly Sahidic tradition from living Bohairic practice, and saying which name belongs to which tradition rather than choosing one for both.
Coptology; Coptic Orthodox liturgical practiceDivinity Atlas Open Questions Register, First Edition
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.