Angelic Choirs
Auphanim
Also Known As The Wheels · Ophanim
Kabbalistic Choirs
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1170 to 1180
The wheels of Ezekiel's throne-chariot, whose rims are set about with eyes and which move wherever the living creatures move without turning as they go. Maimonides places them second of the ten ranks, and the Golden Dawn table assigns them to Chokmah. The name is simply the Hebrew for wheels, and the vision in Ezekiel 1 is the whole of the scriptural warrant for them.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period Origin PeriodSet out as a ten rank ordering by Maimonides in the twelfth century, and carried in Kabbalistic literature thereafter 2 Place of OriginFustat, Old Cairo, Egypt, where Maimonides composed the Mishneh Torah. 2 Attributed Author / CompilerMaimonides sets out the ten ranks in the Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot Yesodei ha-Torah; no individual devised the list of names, which is a commonplace of the earlier angelology 2 Origin of the NameHebrew ofanim, the wheels, from the wheels beside the living creatures in the opening vision of Ezekiel 3 Attributions
SephirahSourced to the subject's own accountChokmah 4Tradition: Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryA standard analytic category in the study of religion 2 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceSignifies wheels, and by extension the turning of the divine chariot 2 Learn More
The Wheels Beside the Living Creatures
The name is the plain Hebrew word for wheels. Ezekiel 1:15-21 places one beside each of the four living creatures of the opening vision: a wheel upon the earth, its construction described as a wheel in the middle of a wheel, its rims high and dreadful and full of eyes round about. The wheels go wherever the creatures go and rise with them, and they do not turn as they go, because the spirit of the living creature is in them.
That single passage is the whole of the scriptural warrant. Nothing else in the Hebrew Bible describes the ophanim, and nothing in Ezekiel calls them a rank of angels; they are part of the apparatus of the throne-chariot, the merkabah, rather than a separate order of beings with duties of their own. The later reading, which turns them into the second rank of a ten-rank hierarchy, is an inference drawn from the vision by readers who wanted a hierarchy, not a statement the vision makes.
What the passage does give is an image of unusual precision, and it is the reason the ophanim are one of the few angelic ranks with a fixed visual form. A wheel that contains another wheel set across it can move in any direction without pivoting, which is exactly the property Ezekiel insists on, and the eyes set around the rim make the mechanism a seeing thing rather than merely a turning one. Chariot mysticism, the tradition of contemplative ascent that took Ezekiel's first chapter as its founding text, kept both details.
Second of Ten, and the Sphere of Chokmah
Maimonides ranks the ophanim second of ten in the Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah 2:7, immediately below the holy living creatures they accompany in the vision. The Golden Dawn table, which pairs each of the ten ranks with a sephirah, assigns them to Chokmah, the second sephirah, so the two systems agree on their height even though they were built for different purposes and centuries apart.
The complication comes from the other direction. Later Western sources routinely identify the Thrones of the Dionysian nine-choir scheme with the ophanim, and the emblem this collection gives the Thrones is the wheel of Ezekiel for that reason. A different line of sources identifies the same Thrones with the erelim instead, the rank the Kabbalistic lists place at Binah. Both identifications circulate, often in the same reference works, and neither is a claim either original list makes about itself.
A reader moving between the two schemes therefore meets the wheels twice, once under a Greek name in third place and once under a Hebrew name in second, and can easily conclude that the two are one system in translation. They are not. The atlas keeps both entries for that reason, so that the divergence stays visible instead of being smoothed away into a single merged entry that would have to hold two positions at once.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.