Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Aspects

Opposition

Major Aspects

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 300 BCE to 200 CE

A hundred and eighty degrees, half the circle, joining signs of the same mode across the wheel: opposite element, opposite polarity, opposite house axis. The classical reading is enmity and open conflict, the two planets in full view of each other with nothing between them. The modern psychological reading is projection, the idea that whichever end of the axis a person does not identify with turns up in other people, and that the work is integration rather than victory. That reading dates from the twentieth century and is a reinterpretation, not a translation; older sources describe the same configuration and do not say anything of the kind.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
300 BCE to 200 CE 1Tradition: Hellenistic astrology in Greco-Roman Egypt
Place of Origin
Alexandria and the Greco-Roman eastern Mediterranean 1
Attributed Author / Compiler
No single author 2
Attributed Author / Compiler
Traditional by the time Ptolemy sets them out in the Tetrabiblos 2
Identity
Classification
Major Aspect 1
Degree Measurement
180° 1
Maximum Orb
6° 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
The opposition: signs seven apart, on the diameter of the circle 2Tradition: Ptolemy, Tetrabiblos
Learn More
The Opposition, the Aspect of Confrontation

The opposition is an aspect of one hundred and eighty degrees, formed when two planets stand directly across the circle from one another, half its span apart. It is one of the five major, or Ptolemaic, aspects, and with the square one of the two hard aspects. One hundred and eighty degrees sets planets in signs of the same mode and complementary element face to face, and the tradition reads the opposition as confrontation, polarity, and the tension of two forces pulling in contrary directions, often projected onto other people and relationships, where the opposed energies are met in another. Like the full moon, which is an opposition of Moon and Sun, it carries a quality of culmination and awareness. It is given a wide orb. These are the interpretive conventions of the astrological tradition for this angular relation between planets.

Book I.13 of Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, compiled in Alexandria in the second century CE, names the opposition alongside the trine, quartile and sextile as one of only four figures the earliest systematic source recognises, the conjunction being treated separately as no aspect at all. Hellenistic astrologers read it through the same whole-sign lens Vettius Valens applies throughout his Anthology of around 175 CE, as two planets set at the full stretch of the circle from one another, each looking the other directly in the face with no intervening sign to soften the contact. The now-common psychological reading, that the querent identifies with one end of the axis and meets the other in the people around them, is a reinterpretation dating from the twentieth century; the older texts describe the same geometry as straightforward enmity and confrontation and offer no theory of projection at all.

Two Ways of Counting the Opposition

The opposition is the simplest aspect to find and the hardest to soften. A hundred and eighty degrees halves the circle, and the signs it joins are always of the same modality and of complementary elements: fire opposes air, earth opposes water. Every sign has exactly one opposite, and the pairs are fixed, so the axis a planet stands on can be named before anything else about the chart is known.

Counting it by sign and counting it by degree almost always agree, which is unusual. Because the opposition spans a full six signs, a planet early in one sign and a planet late in its opposite are still within a generous orb of the exact angle in most systems, so the sign-based and degree-based readings rarely part company the way they do for the square or the sextile. The practical disputes about the opposition are therefore not about whether it is present but about what it does.

Traditional sources place it with the square among the configurations of enmity and pair it with obstruction, open conflict and things that come to a person from outside. Modern psychological practice reads the same angle as a demand for integration between two functions that are each incomplete, and treats projection, the attribution of one end of the axis to another person, as its characteristic mechanism. That reading belongs to the twentieth century and to the psychological turn in astrology generally; it is not what an ancient source means by the term. Both are in circulation, and they lead to different advice.

Angle and Origin

The opposition is fundamental to the Hellenistic aspect doctrine given systematic form by Ptolemy, and like the sextile, square and trine, rather than the conjunction, it belongs among the four configurations he counted as true aspects, since bodies six signs apart look directly across the circle at one another. Its glyph is two small circles joined by a straight line, the pairing of circles standing for the two bodies and the connecting stroke for the diameter between them, a shape distinct enough from the conjunction's single circle and hook that confusion between the two marks was unlikely even in cramped manuscript margins.

The sign is attested with the other aspect glyphs in the medieval Byzantine codices that preserve Greek horoscopes, and it was carried into the standardised printed tables of the Renaissance largely unchanged. Among the aspect marks it is one of the minority to have been given a dedicated Unicode codepoint of its own, OPPOSITION at U+260D in the Miscellaneous Symbols block, encoded since the first release of the Unicode Standard in 1993 rather than left to be improvised from letters or general-purpose geometric characters, as several of the minor aspects still are.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

2, Numbers

The circle halved, 180 degrees, the second harmonic.

Source Harmonics in AstrologyJohn M. Addey

Symbolized By

The symbol's own cited description identifies its glyph as that of this astrological aspect.

Source A History of Western AstrologyNicholas Campion
Sources
1. A History of Western Astrology
Nicholas Campion, Continuum, 2009vol. 1, on the configurations of the signsView the Source
2. Tetrabiblos
Claudius Ptolemy, W. Foulsham, 1900Book I, ch. 13, on the applying and separating configurations
Quote, Book I, ch. 13, on the applying and separating configurations
The five figures Ptolemy admits, derived from the divisions of the circle that fall on whole signs.
View the Source
Anthology (Anthologiarum Libri Novem)
Vettius Valens, B.G. Teubner, 175Book II, on the configurations of the signs
Quote, Book II, on the configurations of the signs
Working Hellenistic practice, in which the aspects hold between whole signs rather than between degrees.
View the Source
Astronomica
Marcus Manilius, Harvard University Press, 1977On the aspect geometry of the signsView the Source
Harmonics in Astrology
John M. Addey, Fowler, 1976View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.