Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Beliefs & Restrictions

Adiaphora, things indifferent

Core Tenets

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Adiaphora are matters neither commanded nor forbidden by scripture, in which a church may order its own practice freely and in which difference is not division. The Formula of Concord devotes an article to them and adds the qualification that has done most of the work since: in a time of confession, when a rite is being demanded precisely in order to deny the gospel, nothing is any longer indifferent. The Moravian formula "in essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things love" is the same doctrine put as a rule of life. It is the mechanism by which a church can be strict about its confession and relaxed about its ceremonies at the same time.

Facts
Position Profile
Key Text
The Formula of Concord, which devotes an article to things indifferent and adds the qualification that in a time of confession, when a rite is being demanded precisely in order to deny the gospel, nothing is any longer indifferent. 1
Belief
Subject
Ritual and worship 1
Category of Belief
Core Tenets 1
Origins
Held By
Lutheranism, and in the same shape the Moravian Church. 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Affirmed, but left to individual conscience 1
Learn More
Matters the Bible Leaves Open

Adiaphora, from a Greek word meaning indifferent things, is the theological category for practices and forms in worship and church life that scripture neither commands nor forbids, leaving a church free to decide them by custom, prudence or local circumstance rather than by binding doctrine. The concept did not originate with the Lutheran Reformation, but it became a live and contested category within it, since reformers needed some way to say that not every inherited Catholic practice, a particular vestment, a ceremony, a liturgical gesture, carried the same doctrinal weight as core teachings like justification by faith. Something genuinely adiaphorous could be kept, dropped or modified without touching the substance of the faith, which in principle made adiaphora a tool for maintaining unity across churches that differed on secondary matters of form. In practice the category turned out to be far harder to apply than to define, because Reformation era Christians disagreed sharply over which practices actually qualified as indifferent and which ones, despite looking like matters of form, carried enough symbolic weight that accepting or rejecting them amounted to a doctrinal statement in disguise. That difficulty is what turned adiaphora from a quiet theological category into the center of one of Lutheranism's sharpest internal controversies within a generation of Luther's own death.

The Controversy the Category Provoked

The Adiaphorist Controversy broke out in Germany after Lutheran forces lost the Schmalkaldic War in 1547, when the victorious Emperor Charles V pressed Lutheran territories to accept the Augsburg Interim, restoring a number of Catholic practices. Philipp Melanchthon and the Wittenberg theologians negotiated a compromise, the Leipzig Interim of December 1548, which accepted the return of certain rites, including extreme unction and confirmation, on the grounds that these were adiaphora, matters of indifferent form rather than substance, while insisting the core Lutheran doctrine of justification by faith be preserved, with the single word alone itself treated as one of the negotiable indifferent matters. Matthias Flacius Illyricus led fierce opposition to this compromise, arguing that accepting these concessions under political pressure and threat could never count as free, genuine indifference, since an adiaphoron accepted under coercion functions as a confession of defeat rather than as a neutral choice, a position later summarized in the phrase nothing is indifferent in a case of confession. The dispute split Lutheran theologians for years and was not resolved by theological argument so much as overtaken by politics, ending when the 1555 Peace of Augsburg recognized Lutheranism as a legally tolerated religion within the empire and removed the immediate pressure that had made the concessions necessary in the first place.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Source The Formula of ConcordJakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz, Nikolaus Selnecker and others
Sources
1. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
The Formula of Concord
Jakob Andreae, Martin Chemnitz, Nikolaus Selnecker and others, 1577Article X, of ecclesiastical rites which are called adiaphora or things indifferentView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.