Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Apophatic and Cataphatic Theology

Also Known As Negative Theology · Via Negativa
God and Divine Nature

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Apophatic theology proceeds by denial, saying what God is not, on the ground that every positive term borrowed from creatures misleads when it is applied to their creator. Cataphatic theology proceeds by affirmation, using the names and images that scripture supplies. In most of the tradition the two are a sequence rather than rivals, since the denials operate on the affirmations, and writers from Pseudo-Dionysius onward treat the way of negation as the completion of the way of affirmation rather than its refutation. Comparable moves appear in Jewish and Islamic negative theology and in the Upanishadic formula neti neti.

Facts
Attestation
Earliest Attestation
Systematized for Christian theology by the anonymous late fifth or early sixth century writer known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, in the Mystical Theology and Divine Names. 2
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Cataphatic theology speaks of God through positive attributes; apophatic theology speaks of God through negation, holding that no positive statement fully captures a reality that exceeds finite categories. 3
The Claim
The Claim
Apophatic theology proceeds by describing God in terms of what God is not, while cataphatic theology makes positive affirmations about God's nature, and Eastern Christian mystical tradition has generally given the apophatic approach a privileged place. 1
Origins
Held By
Christian theology broadly, though Eastern Orthodox tradition, following the Cappadocian Fathers and Pseudo-Dionysius, gives the apophatic approach a particularly privileged place. 1
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1
Learn More
Two Ways of Speaking About God

Cataphatic theology, from the Greek for affirmation, speaks of God through positive attributes: God is good, God is powerful, God is loving. Apophatic theology, the way of negation, holds that God so exceeds any category available to finite language that the truer approach is to say what God is not, God is not limited, not divisible, not comprehensible by reason, treating even the most exalted positive statement as ultimately inadequate to its object. The two are not simply rival methods so much as two moments most major theological traditions hold together: cataphatic language gives believers something to affirm and worship, while apophatic language guards against mistaking any human concept, however exalted, for the reality of God itself.

Jewish, Christian and Islamic theology each developed sophisticated apophatic strands, from Maimonides' insistence that positive attributes applied to God can only be understood negatively, to Christian mystical theology's cloud of unknowing, to the Islamic tanzih, the declaration of God's transcendence above any comparison. Indian thought offers a structurally similar move in the Upanishadic formula neti neti, not this, not this, applied to Brahman.

Pseudo-Dionysius and the Way Beyond Words

The most influential systematic treatment of apophatic theology in the Christian tradition comes from the anonymous late fifth or early sixth century author known as Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, whose Mystical Theology and Divine Names describe an ascent that moves through cataphatic affirmation, then strips those affirmations away one by one, and finally passes beyond negation itself into a darkness beyond both speech and silence, where the soul touches God not by knowing but by a kind of unknowing. This framework shaped Eastern Christian theology directly and reached the Latin West through translations that influenced figures including Thomas Aquinas and the anonymous author of the Cloud of Unknowing.

Eastern Orthodox theology has generally kept apophaticism closer to the center of its account of God than Western Christianity has, associated with the distinction, developed by Gregory Palamas, between God's unknowable essence and God's knowable energies. Apophatic and cataphatic theology are not exclusive to Christianity, and this atlas records the doctrine as a comparative structure that recurs, with different technical vocabulary, wherever a tradition holds both that God can be spoken of and that no speech fully reaches what God is.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Builds its teaching on contemplative unknowing directly on the apophatic tradition

Belongs to Tradition

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Theology proceeds by denial as well as by affirmation, and the denials operate on the affirmations rather than cancelling them. The order is inherited from the Cappadocians and from Pseudo-Dionysius.

Related To

Neti Neti, Doctrines

The Upanishadic formula of denial, a parallel outside the Abrahamic traditions.

Sources
1. The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church
Vladimir Lossky, James Clarke, 1957
2. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
3. Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes
John Meyendorff, Fordham University Press, 1979View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.