Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Kasb (Acquisition)

Sin, Grace and the Human Condition

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Two positions press from either side. If God creates human acts, punishing a person for them looks unjust. If human beings create their own acts, then something is being created that God did not create. Al-Ashari proposed that God creates the act and the agent acquires it, so that the power to act is real at the moment of acting without being an independent creative power. Maturidi theology took a similar line with a larger role for human choice. The Mutazila rejected acquisition as an evasion, holding that a human being is the real author of their own acts, since God cannot justly punish an act He alone created; divine justice, for them, required nothing less. Traditionalist Hanbali writers were unhappy with the whole exchange, regarding the vocabulary as speculative theology imported into a question the texts had already answered. Later Muslim philosophers treated acquisition as a term that names the difficulty rather than resolving it.

Facts
Origins
Held By
The Ashari and, with more room for human choice, Maturidi schools of Sunni theology, who hold that God creates the act while the human being acquires responsibility for it; rejected by the Mutazila, who held a human being to be the real author of their own acts. 1
Origin of the Name
Arabic kasb, acquisition or earning. 1Tradition: Arabic
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1Tradition: Sunni
Doctrinal Category
God and Divine Nature 1
Position Profile
Principal Proponent
Al-Ashari; Maturidi theology took a similar line while leaving a larger role for human choice. 1
Principal Critic
The Mutazila, who rejected acquisition as an evasion and held that a human being is the real author of their own acts, since God cannot justly punish an act He alone created. 1
Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting Source
God creates the act and the human being acquires it, so that the power to act is real at the moment of acting without being an independent creative power. 1
Disputed
Point in Dispute
Whether acquisition resolves the difficulty or only names it. Traditionalist Hanbali writers objected to the whole exchange as speculative theology imported into a question the texts had already answered, and later Muslim philosophers treated the term as a label for the problem. 1
Learn More
The Name Its Own Opponents Chose for Them

The school that argued hardest for human free will in early Islam is remembered today by a name its opponents gave it, and the name says the opposite of what the school believed. Qadar means decree or determination, the very thing these theologians denied applied absolutely to human acts, yet the label Qadariyya stuck to defenders of free will rather than to the determinists who might seem to own the word by right. Watt traces the reversal to how the debate was actually fought, each side accusing the other of holding qadar in the wrong sense, predestinarians charging that denying divine determination amounted to denying qadar altogether, and the accusation outlived the argument that produced it, fixing itself as a name imposed from outside rather than chosen from within. The Mutazila, direct heirs of the position, resented the label enough to prefer calling themselves the people of justice instead, arguing precisely that a God who determines an act and then punishes it commits injustice, so justice rather than destiny was the word they wanted attached to their theology. Kasb, acquisition, was the settlement a later generation reached between the two accusations, letting God remain the sole creator of the act while giving the human agent enough of a stake in it to be justly judged, a formula built to satisfy both sides and satisfying neither side fully.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Acquisition is the Ashari answer to human responsibility: God creates the act and the human being acquires it, which is meant to preserve God's sole creative power without leaving the human act unowned.

Source Islamic Creeds: A SelectionW. Montgomery Watt
Islam, Religions

Critiqued By

Mutazila, Schools of Theology

The Mutazila rejected acquisition as an evasion, holding that a human being is the real author of their own acts, since God cannot justly punish an act He alone created.

Source Islamic Creeds: A SelectionW. Montgomery Watt

Positions on This Question

Sunni, Denominations

Kasb, acquisition, is the Sunni answer to how a person can be answerable for an act God creates, and is held in the Ashari and Maturidi forms that dominate Sunni theology.

Source Islamic Creeds: A SelectionW. Montgomery Watt
Sources
1. Islamic Creeds: A Selection
W. Montgomery Watt, Edinburgh University Press, 1994View the Source
Free Will and Predestination in Early Islam
W. Montgomery Watt, Luzac and Co, 1948The debate between the Mutazila and the Ashari and Maturidi schools over acquisition, chapters on the rise of the qadar controversyView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.