Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Doctrines

Sanctification

Also Known As Growth in holiness · being made holy
Salvation and Liberation

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1517 to 1646

Where justification concerns the believer's standing before God, sanctification concerns the believer's actual transformation, and the traditions relate the two differently. Catholic and Orthodox theology tends to hold them closely together, salvation being a real renewal from the first; Reformation theology distinguishes them, justification complete at once and sanctification a lifelong growth that never grounds acceptance. Within Protestantism the Wesleyan and Holiness movements taught a further work of "entire sanctification" or Christian perfection, a claim the Reformed tradition rejects.

Facts
Status
Status Within the Tradition
Standard teaching, not formally defined 1Tradition: Calvinism (Reformed)
Sourced to the subject's own accountA standard stage of the Reformed ordo salutis, confessed in the Westminster Confession
Doctrinal CategorySourced to the subject's own account
Salvation and Liberation 1
Origins
Origin PeriodSourced to the subject's own account
1517 to 1646 1
Held BySourced to the subject's own account
Christianity 1
Learn More
Being Made Holy, Over Time

Sanctification is the process by which a person is made holy. In Christian theology it is distinguished from justification, which is the declaring or making of a person righteous before God, and the classical Protestant statement of the difference is that justification is an act, complete, not admitting of degrees, while sanctification is a work, progressive and unfinished in this life. Catholic theology joins the two more closely, holding that justification itself involves an inward renewal and not only a change of standing, and much of the sixteenth-century argument turns on whether that is one doctrine or two.

The underlying scriptural idea is holiness as separation and belonging: Israel is holy because set apart to God (Leviticus 20:26), and the New Testament calls believers hagioi, holy ones or saints, as a description of their standing before it is a description of their attainment. Paul states sanctification both as accomplished, "you were washed, you were sanctified" (1 Corinthians 6:11), and as commanded, "this is the will of God, your sanctification" (1 Thessalonians 4:3). Every tradition has to hold those together, and they resolve the tension in different directions.

The principal division is whether entire sanctification, a real freedom from voluntary sin, is attainable in this life. John Wesley taught Christian perfection as a genuine possibility, understood as perfection in love rather than in knowledge or judgement; the nineteenth-century holiness movement made it central, and Pentecostalism emerged from that movement and reframed the second work as baptism in the Spirit with its own evidence. Reformed theology denies attainable perfection, holding that sin remains until death and reading the relevant texts as describing a direction rather than a reachable state. Lutheran theology tends to keep justification so firmly at the centre that sanctification appears as its fruit rather than as a separate programme, on the ground that making it a programme reintroduces works. Eastern Orthodoxy frames the whole matter differently again, as theosis, deification, participation in the uncreated energies, a process with no terminus, and generally regards the Western division between justification and sanctification as a scholastic distinction its own tradition has not needed.

The means are broadly agreed even where the theory is not: scripture, prayer, the sacraments or ordinances, the discipline of the community, and suffering. What differs is how much is expected, and the pastoral consequences are real, assurance and the lack of it, scrupulosity, and the recurring difficulty of how to speak honestly about continuing sin to people who have been told that they are holy.

A Council Hardened It, a Declaration Later Softened It

Article one lays out how the Christian traditions distribute sanctification and justification differently. The sharpest of those differences was not merely argued informally; it was fixed by conciliar decree on one side and, more than four centuries later, substantially eased by joint declaration.

The Council of Trent's Decree on Justification (1547) responded directly to the Reformation by affirming that justification itself includes a real, inherent transformation of the sinner rather than only an external, forensic declaration, and its accompanying canons anathematise the position that faith alone, without works flowing from inherent righteousness, suffices for justification. That conciliar act gave the Catholic and Reformation positions the sharp, mutually anathematising edges article one describes, and for over four hundred years the dispute was treated by both sides as dividing the essential meaning of the gospel itself.

The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church in 1999 and later joined by Methodist and Reformed bodies, states that the two sides' remaining differences in language and emphasis are compatible with a shared basic understanding, and that the sixteenth-century condemnations, read in that light, do not apply to the other side's actual teaching as now presented. The declaration does not erase the historic disagreement; it reclassifies it as a difference the two traditions can live with rather than one requiring mutual condemnation, a rare instance of a centuries-old doctrinal division being formally, if partially, resolved rather than merely outlived.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Sanctification as the believer's progressive renewal after the image of God is confessional doctrine per the Westminster Confession of Faith, Chapter XIII, Of Sanctification, 1646.

Source The Westminster Confession of FaithWestminster Assemblythe holders' own account
Source Encyclopedia of ReligionMircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.)

Sanctification and good works are taught to follow justifying faith as its necessary fruit, though they do not merit favor before God, per the Augsburg Confession, Article VI, Of New Obedience.

Source The Augsburg ConfessionPhilipp Melanchthon

Sanctification is taught as a process of growth in holy love, expounded in Wesley's sermon The Scripture Way of Salvation, and Methodism carries it further than most Protestant traditions toward the possibility of entire sanctification in this life.

Source The Sermons of John WesleyJohn Wesley
Sources
1. The Westminster Confession of Faith
Westminster Assembly, 1646Chapter XIII, Of Sanctificationthe holders' own accountView the Source
The Sermons of John Wesley
John Wesley, Abingdon Press, 2013The Scripture Way of SalvationView the Source
The Augsburg Confession
Philipp Melanchthon, 1530Article VI, Of New ObedienceView the Source
The Holy Bible
Anonymous (multiple authors), Robert Barker, 1611Leviticus 20:26; 1 Corinthians 6:11; 1 Thessalonians 4:3View the Source
The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005Sanctification; entire sanctificationView the Source
Encyclopedia of Religion
Mircea Eliade (ed.); Lindsay Jones (ed., 2nd ed.), Macmillan Reference, 2005View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.