Home›Sources›The Augsburg ConfessionSourcesThe Augsburg ConfessionCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "The Augsburg Confession." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/the-augsburg-confession.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). The Augsburg Confession. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/the-augsburg-confessionCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-the-augsburg-confession, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {The Augsburg Confession}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/the-augsburg-confession}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXThe Augsburg Confession is Philipp Melanchthon's own primary text, the founding Lutheran confession presented to the Holy Roman Empire's Diet of Augsburg in 1530. As a primary confessional document it is authoritative for what the historical Confession itself states, the doctrinal position Lutheran reformers put forward at that specific moment, not for how any particular modern Lutheran body currently interprets or applies it, which is a separate and denomination-specific question needing its own source. Use it to establish the historical Confession's own wording and doctrinal claims as presented in 1530.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (167 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Philipp Melanchthon's own primary text, the founding Lutheran confession presented to the Diet of Augsburg in 1530; authoritative for what the historical confession itself states, not for how any modern Lutheran body currently interprets it.NotesWell-attestedThe founding Lutheran confession, presented to the Diet of Augsburg.CitationAuthorWell-attestedPhilipp MelanchthonPublication YearWell-attested1530URLWell-attestedhttps://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc7/hcc7.ii.ix.iii.htmlSource TypeWell-attestedprimary-textClaims Backed By This Source (167 claims)This source backs 167 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested. As cited relationships: 58 holds, 6 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 60 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicDoctrines, 71 claims: 5 well-attested, 30 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 3 rejected Here, 1 held Differently, 31 general references.Beliefs & Restrictions, 29 claims: 14 well-attested, 7 holds, 8 general references.Practices, 18 claims: 5 holds, 4 critiqued Here, 9 general references.Denominations, 17 claims: 8 well-attested, 6 holds, 3 general references.Rituals, 10 claims: 5 holds, 5 general references.Creeds & Confessions, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.Religious Roles & Titles, 6 claims: 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 3 general references.Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.Well-attested39ArticlesMelanchthon's Peace Offering at AugsburgWhat the Doctrine Did Not AbolishBeliefs & RestrictionsFasting in LentInfant baptism (paedobaptism)Justification by faith alone (sola fide)MemorialismSacramental union (real presence in the Eucharist)Salvation by graceThe Holy TrinityCreeds & ConfessionsAugsburg ConfessionDenominationsEvangelical Lutheran Church in AmericaDoctrinesSola FideThe Priesthood of All BelieversSourcesThe Augsburg ConfessionHolds58Beliefs & RestrictionsInfant baptism (paedobaptism)Justification by faith alone (sola fide)MemorialismSacramental union (real presence in the Eucharist)Salvation by graceThe Holy TrinityThe resurrection of ChristCreeds & ConfessionsAugsburg ConfessionDenominationsLutheranismDoctrinesApocalypseChristian eschatologyCreation ex nihiloEcclesiastical Polity and the Validity of Holy OrdersGraceHeresyHoly SpiritHypostatic unionIncarnationJustificationLogosOmnipotenceOmniscienceOriginal sinPenal SubstitutionRedemptionResurrectionSalvationSanctificationSola FideSon of GodThe Last JudgementThe Priesthood of All BelieversThe Virgin BirthTranscendence and immanenceTrinityPracticesAlmsgiving / CharityFastingLiturgical ColorsLiturgy of the HoursObserving the SabbathReligious Roles & TitlesBishopPastorRitualsBaptismConfirmationHoly OrdersInfant Baptism and ChristeningMarriage CeremonyCritiqued Here6DoctrinesRegulative Principle of WorshipPracticesCelibacy / MonasticismPilgrimageSeven SacramentsVeneration of saints and MaryReligious Roles & TitlesPopeRejected Here3DoctrinesPapal primacy and infallibilityPurgatoryHeld Differently1DoctrinesAtonementGeneral References60Beliefs & RestrictionsFasting in LentInfant baptism (paedobaptism)Justification by faith alone (sola fide)MemorialismSacramental union (real presence in the Eucharist)Salvation by graceThe Holy TrinityThe resurrection of ChristCreeds & ConfessionsAugsburg ConfessionDenominationsChurch of SwedenEvangelical Lutheran Church in AmericaLutheranismDoctrinesApocalypseAtonementChristian eschatologyCreation ex nihiloEcclesiastical Polity and the Validity of Holy OrdersGraceHeresyHoly SpiritHypostatic unionIncarnationJustificationLogosOmnipotenceOmniscienceOriginal sinPapal primacy and infallibilityPenal SubstitutionPurgatoryRedemptionRegulative Principle of WorshipResurrectionSalvationSanctificationSola FideSola ScripturaSon of GodThe Last JudgementThe Priesthood of All BelieversThe Virgin BirthTranscendence and immanenceTrinityPracticesAlmsgiving / CharityCelibacy / MonasticismFastingLiturgical ColorsLiturgy of the HoursObserving the SabbathPilgrimageShowing 1 to 50 of 60 entities carrying this claim. NextComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year