Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Figures

John Chrysostom

Also Known As Chrysostom · Ioannes Chrysostomos · The Golden Mouth
Saints

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Preacher at Antioch and, from 398, archbishop of Constantinople, remembered by an epithet later readers gave him: Chrysostomos, the golden mouth. His surviving output is enormous, chiefly homilies working verse by verse through books of scripture, and it made him the most copied preacher of the Greek church. He attacked the wealth of the capital and the conduct of its court in the same voice he used on scripture, was deposed by a synod of his opponents in 403, recalled, exiled again the following year, and died in 407 being marched further east. The ordinary Sunday liturgy of the Byzantine rite carries his name, and so do eight homilies against Judaising Christians that have had a long and damaging afterlife.

Facts
Identity
Gender
Male 3
Position Profile
Key Text
His homilies, working verse by verse through books of scripture, are his enormous surviving body of work and made him the most copied preacher of the Greek church. 3
Disputed
Lifespan or Floruit
347 to 407 CE 3
The source marks this year circa, its own approximate estimate rather than a fixed date.
Tradition
The Divine Liturgy that carries his name is the ordinary Sunday service of the Byzantine rite. The attribution is traditional and the text is the outcome of a long Constantinopolitan development rather than a composition of his 4Tradition: Eastern Orthodoxy
Robert F. Taft's The Byzantine Rite: A Short History (1992) records that liturgical scholarship, examining the manuscript history of the Divine Liturgy attributed to John Chrysostom, treats the received text as a later development rather than his personal composition, while popular and some devotional presentation continues to describe him as its author. Taft notes the disagreement runs between the scholarly account and the traditional one, not between two competing scholarly camps.
Attestation
Historicity
Historically attested 1
Historically attested, with the largest surviving corpus of any Greek father
Veneration Today
Actively venerated in a living tradition 2
Canonization
Pre-Congregation: venerated before any formal process existed 3Tradition: Christianity
Origins
Place of Origin
Antioch in Syria 3
Open Questions
How Its Legacy Is Contested
What follows, for the veneration and for the liturgical texts that carry his name, from the Adversus Judaeos homilies and their later use is not settled. 1
The texts, their dating and their later use in antisemitic polemic are documented and not in dispute. What is unsettled is the consequence. Historians locate the homilies in a local Antiochene quarrel and in the conventions of ancient invective, and others hold that the framing does not answer for the use later made of them. Churches that venerate him have acknowledged harm without reaching any agreed position on the calendar or on the liturgical texts, and no such decision has been taken publicly and with reasons. This is not a question that evidence can close.
Life
Lifespan or Floruit
c. 347-407 3
Office Held
Archbishop of Constantinople from 398; deposed at the Synod of the Oak in 403, recalled, and deposed again in 404 1
Manner of Death
Died of natural causes 1
Manner of Death Detail
Died in 407 at Comana in Pontus, on the road to a further place of exile 1
Attributions
Tradition
The eight homilies known as Adversus Judaeos, delivered at Antioch in 386 and 387 against Christians keeping Jewish observances, were later quoted in medieval and modern antisemitic polemic 1Tradition: Christianity
The homilies exist, their dating is secure and their reception history is documented. What is argued is how they should be read: historians place them in a local Antiochene dispute over religious boundaries and in the conventions of ancient invective, while others hold that the framing does not answer for the use made of them. Churches that venerate John have acknowledged the harm.
Veneration
Feast Day
13 November in the Byzantine calendar; 13 September in the Roman calendar, to which it was moved in the revision of 1969 3Tradition: Christianity
Learn More
The Golden Mouth, and the Cost of Preaching at a Court

John was trained in rhetoric at Antioch under the pagan orator Libanius, spent years as an ascetic in the hills outside the city, and returned with his health broken to be ordained and to preach. The Antiochene years produced most of the homilies that made his reputation, working through Genesis, the Psalms, Matthew, John and the letters of Paul verse by verse, and they are the reason his name survived: J. N. D. Kelly's biography notes that more manuscripts of Chrysostom survive than of any other Greek father.

In 398 he was taken to Constantinople, effectively against his will, and made archbishop. He preached in the capital the way he had preached in Antioch, which turned out to be a different act. He attacked the wealth of the rich and the display of the court, he cut the episcopal household budget and gave the money to hospitals, he intervened against bishops in Asia Minor whom he found guilty of selling ordinations, and he made enemies at every level, including the empress Eudoxia.

In 403 a synod convened outside Chalcedon, remembered as the Synod of the Oak, deposed him on a list of charges assembled by Theophilus of Alexandria. He was recalled almost at once after public disorder and an earthquake, deposed again the following year, and sent into exile in Armenia, from which he kept up a correspondence. In 404 the order came to move him further, to the eastern edge of the Black Sea, and he died on the road at Comana in 407.

A Liturgy of His Name, and Homilies Harder to Carry

The Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom is the eucharistic service used on most days of the year throughout the Byzantine rite, which makes it, by frequency of celebration, one of the most used liturgical texts in the world. The attribution to John is traditional and old, and Robert Taft's account of the rite treats the received text as the outcome of a long development in Constantinople rather than as a composition of his; the connection is best read as the rite of his city taking his name, not as a document he wrote out.

The harder part of his legacy is a set of eight homilies delivered at Antioch in 386 and 387, usually called Adversus Judaeos, against the Judaisers. The immediate target was Christians in his congregation who kept Jewish fasts and festivals and used the synagogue, and the language is violent even by the standards of ancient invective, describing the synagogue in terms that later readers put to uses John did not live to see. The homilies were quoted in medieval polemic and again in the twentieth century by people with murderous intentions.

Two things are true at once and the atlas records both. Historians of late antiquity, Kelly among them, place the texts in a specific local quarrel about religious boundaries in a city where the two communities lived close together, and note that this genre of attack was aimed at his own congregation. And churches that venerate him have themselves acknowledged the damage the texts have done. Neither observation cancels the other, and neither is the last word.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Archbishop of Constantinople from 398, deposed twice.

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "The Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is Stevan Stojanovic Mokranjac's 1895 setting of the Serbian Orthodox eucharistic service, composed from Serbian chant traditions traced to the end of the..."

Source Mokranjac Divine Liturgy (Wikipedia and Project Mokranjac)Wikipedia contributors and Project Mokranjac

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "book is his scholarly biography of John Chrysostom, the ascetic, preacher and bishop of Constantinople known for his eloquence."

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "including Ambrose of Milan and John Chrysostom, on the ancient church's own commemoration practices, and it has stood as a working clergy reference within Russian Orthodoxy for over a century."

Source Handbook for Church ServersSergius V. Bulgakov

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "article on the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (Mokranjac) and Project Mokranjac, a dedicated resource on the composer."

Source Mokranjac Divine Liturgy (Wikipedia and Project Mokranjac)Wikipedia contributors and Project Mokranjac

Venerated as a saint from before any formal process of recognition existed.

Source The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised editionF. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.)

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "the Great, Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, three fourth century bishops venerated together on a joint feast day of January 30."

This source names John Chrysostom directly: "the Great, Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, describing their joint feast of January 30, established after the three appeared together in a vision declaring "there are no divisions among..."

Belongs to Tradition

A father of the Greek church, kept in the Byzantine calendar and in the Roman one alike.

Source The Orthodox ChurchTimothy Ware (Kallistos Ware)

Depicted In

Namesake Of

This edge restates authorship attribution rather than a contested claim in its own right. The Liturgy's own origin-period fact already states its core prayers are attested by the Barberini codex around 800 and that the attribution to Chrysostom, who died in 407, is conventional rather than a matter of direct authorship, in full.

Source The Byzantine Rite: A Short HistoryRobert F. Taft

Related To

Sources
1. Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom, Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop
J. N. D. Kelly, Cornell University Press, 1995View the Source
2. The Orthodox Church
Timothy Ware (Kallistos Ware), Penguin Books, 1993View the Source
3. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd revised edition
F. L. Cross and E. A. Livingstone (eds.), Oxford University Press, 2005View the Source
4. The Byzantine Rite: A Short History
Robert F. Taft, The Liturgical Press, Collegeville, 1992View the Source
Open Questions (1 open question)
How should the Adversus Judaeos homilies be weighed against John Chrysostom's continuing veneration, and by whom?

The texts, their dating and their later use in antisemitic polemic are all documented and not in dispute. What is unsettled is what follows. Historians locate them in a local Antiochene quarrel and in the conventions of ancient invective; others hold that the framing does not answer for the use made of them. Churches that venerate him have acknowledged harm without any agreed consequence for the liturgical texts or the calendar.

What would resolve this This is not resolvable by evidence. It would be settled, if at all, by a deliberate judgement of the churches concerned, taken publicly and with reasons, in the way other reception questions have been handled.
Patristics; Jewish-Christian relations; ecclesiologyJ. N. D. Kelly, Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom, Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.