A combined citation covering Wikipedia's article on the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (Mokranjac) and Project Mokranjac, a dedicated resource on the composer. Their strength is specific, corroborated detail on the work's chant sources and its officially recognized liturgical status in the Serbian Orthodox Church. Their limit is that a claim about exactly how the work was first received when new, as opposed to its later canonical status, needs a source examining 1890s Serbian church and concert records directly.
Facts
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors and Project Mokranjac
PublisherWikipedia and mokranjac.org
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Liturgy_of_St._John_Chrysostom_(Mokranjac)
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
A combined citation to a Wikipedia article and Project Mokranjac, a dedicated fan and study resource on the composer rather than an academic publisher, matching the corpus's tier for combined community and specialist-site citations without independent peer review. Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names John Chrysostom directly: "article on the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (Mokranjac) and Project Mokranjac, a dedicated resource on the composer."
This source names Serbian Orthodox Church directly: "recognized liturgical status in the Serbian Orthodox Church."
Claims Backed By This Source (28 claims)
This source backs 28 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Musical Works, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.