Haab Months
Mak
Haab Months
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 250 to 900 CE
The thirteenth of the eighteen twenty-day months of the Haab, Mac in Landa's spelling. Its name is usually glossed as enclosed or covered. It ran from 0 Mak to 19 Mak. Landa records ceremonies associated with particular months in some detail, and his account is the fullest description of Maya ritual practice written in the sixteenth century, but it must be read knowing that the same man burned the Maya books he found in Yucatan on the grounds that they contained superstition and falsehood.
Facts
Origins
Origin Period250 to 900 CE 1Tradition: Classic Maya inscriptions Origin PeriodHaab month names are attested in Classic period Maya inscriptions and in the Postclassic codices, part of a 365 day civil calendar securely in use across the Maya lowlands from at least the Late Preclassic period into the Spanish colonial era. 1 Place of OriginThe Maya lowlands of the Yucatan peninsula, Guatemala, Belize and Chiapas. 1 Origin of the NameThe name recorded here, Mak, is the colonial Yucatec form set down after the conquest, and the gloss beside it is a colonial gloss. The Classic glyph for the same period is read differently. 2Tradition: Colonial Yucatec Maya sources (the Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan and the Books of Chilam Balam) Meaning
Literal Meaning Status
Standing as a Comparative CategoryA standard analytic category in the study of religion 1 Attestation
Meaning in the Attesting SourceUsually glossed as enclosed or covered. 3 Learn More
Mak, the Enclosed Month
Mak is the thirteenth of the nineteen periods of the Haab, the 365-day Maya solar calendar. Recorded here by its Yucatec name, Mak, glossed as enclosed or covered, the month is known from the colonial sources and, in its glyphic form, from the Classic inscriptions. Like each of the eighteen full months it counts twenty days, and a Maya date names a day by its position within the month alongside the interlocking Tzolk'in day sign and number. These are the features of the Maya solar calendar, built of eighteen twenty-day months and a closing five-day period. Together with the 260-day sacred count it forms the two-cycle system the Maya used to locate every day, the paired Tzolk'in and Haab date repeating only across the fifty-two-year span of the Calendar Round.
Mak, the thirteenth month, is generally translated as enclosed or covered, a reading epigraphers connect to a described rite involving the ceremonial extinguishing and rekindling of fire, recorded by Diego de Landa as taking place around this part of the ritual year and involving elderly participants pouring water on a new fire before it was ceremonially relit, a renewal rite structurally comparable, though not identical in mechanics or meaning, to the much later and unrelated Aztec New Fire Ceremony marking the completion of their own fifty-two-year Calendar Round binding. Whether Mak's name derives specifically from the covering or enclosing of the fire, or from an unrelated sense of the same root, is not settled with certainty from the surviving colonial and epigraphic sources.
Mak in the Calendar Round
Mak is glossed as enclosed or covered, and it is the thirteenth of the eighteen full months. Landa's account associates the month with a ceremony he calls Tuppkak, involving fire, though the details of his description are compressed and have been read in more than one way.
Where a colonial festival notice is thin the responsible course is to report it as thin. The Relacion survives only in an abridgement made after Landa's death, its month notices vary greatly in length and clarity, and several have no counterpart in any other source. That does not make them worthless, but it does mean a modern reconstruction of a Postclassic ceremony built on one such notice is a reconstruction and should say so.
A Maya date does not name a month and a number in the way a European one does. It names a day in the 260-day Tzolk'in, by number and sign, and a position in the 365-day Haab, by day and month, and the two together form the Calendar Round, which repeats only after 18,980 days, a little under fifty-two years. Within the Haab the days of a month are numbered from zero to nineteen, and the zero day is not called first but seated, the seating of the month, a usage the Classic inscriptions write with its own glyph.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Contained In
One of the eighteen twenty day months of the Haab.
Originates in Language
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
Sources
1. The Maya (9th edition)
Michael D. Coe and Stephen Houston, Thames and Hudson, 2015ch. on Maya arithmetic, writing and the calendarView the Source 2. Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: An Introduction
J. Eric S. Thompson, University of Oklahoma Press, 1962The Haab and the month glyphsQuote, The Haab and the month glyphs
Phonemic analysis of the month glyphs in pre-Columbian inscriptions shows the names varied considerably from region to region and from period to period, so the colonial Yucatec forms are one attested set rather than the Maya usage.
View the Source 3. Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan
Diego de Landa, Dante S.A., 1864The count of the year and the monthsQuote, The count of the year and the months
The Haab month names are known in colonial Yucatec spelling as transcribed in the sixteenth century, and this is the principal source for them and for the ritual associated with each month, including the treatment of Wayeb.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.