The unit names are Maya, attested in the inscriptions and in the colonial sources, though not all of them are certainly the Classic-period terms. Baktun in particular is a modern coinage on a Maya pattern rather than a name recorded in the inscriptions, and the Classic name for the unit is not securely known. The lower units are on firmer ground.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The language in which the count's own month names are framed. The communities that use Maya calendrics work in many Mayan languages.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The unit names are Maya, attested in the inscriptions and in the colonial sources, though not all of them are certainly the Classic-period terms. Baktun in particular is a modern coinage on a Maya pattern rather than a name recorded in the inscriptions, and the Classic name for the unit is not securely known. The lower units are on firmer ground.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The unit names are Maya, attested in the inscriptions and in the colonial sources, though not all of them are certainly the Classic-period terms. Baktun in particular is a modern coinage on a Maya pattern rather than a name recorded in the inscriptions, and the Classic name for the unit is not securely known. The lower units are on firmer ground.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
Maya, Cultures Classic Maya is the language of the Classic period hieroglyphic inscriptions.
The Calendar Round is attested in Classic Maya inscriptions. The language in which the calendar's own terminology is framed. Every one of these calendars is used today by communities working in many other languages, and the link records the technical language rather than the languages of its users.
The Long Count is attested in Classic Maya inscriptions. The language in which the calendar's own terminology is framed. Every one of these calendars is used today by communities working in many other languages, and the link records the technical language rather than the languages of its users.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The unit names are Maya, attested in the inscriptions and in the colonial sources, though not all of them are certainly the Classic-period terms. Baktun in particular is a modern coinage on a Maya pattern rather than a name recorded in the inscriptions, and the Classic name for the unit is not securely known. The lower units are on firmer ground.
The language in which the count's own terminology is framed. The communities that keep it work in many Mayan languages.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The unit names are Maya, attested in the inscriptions and in the colonial sources, though not all of them are certainly the Classic-period terms. Baktun in particular is a modern coinage on a Maya pattern rather than a name recorded in the inscriptions, and the Classic name for the unit is not securely known. The lower units are on firmer ground.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.
The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.