Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Haab Months

Wo

Haab Months

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 250 to 900 CE

The second of the eighteen twenty-day months of the Haab, written Uo in Landa's colonial spelling. Its name is usually read as a black conjunction, pairing it with the following month Sip as a red one, and the colour terms are secure where the second element is a reconstruction rather than a settled reading. It ran from 0 Wo to 19 Wo. Phonemic study of the month glyphs in pre-Columbian inscriptions has shown that the names varied considerably between regions and periods, so the colonial Yucatec forms used here are one attested set rather than the Maya usage.

Facts
Origins
Origin Period
250 to 900 CE 1Tradition: Classic Maya inscriptions
Origin Period
Haab month names are attested in Classic period Maya inscriptions and in the Postclassic codices, part of a 365 day civil calendar securely in use across the Maya lowlands from at least the Late Preclassic period into the Spanish colonial era. 1
Place of Origin
The Maya lowlands of the Yucatan peninsula, Guatemala, Belize and Chiapas. 1
Origin of the Name
The name recorded here, Wo, is the colonial Yucatec form set down after the conquest, and the gloss beside it is a colonial gloss. The Classic glyph for the same period is read differently. 2Tradition: Colonial Yucatec Maya sources (the Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan and the Books of Chilam Balam)
Language
Maya hieroglyphic 1
Language
Yucatec Maya 2
Disputed
Meaning in the Attesting Source
Usually read as a black conjunction, pairing it with the following month Sip as a red one, though the colour term is secure while the second element is a reconstruction rather than a settled reading. 3
Read from colonial Yucatec attestation rather than a Classic-period glyphic decipherment, so the second element of the gloss remains a scholarly reconstruction rather than a certain reading. The colour term itself is well founded, but phonemic study of the month glyphs in pre-Columbian inscriptions has shown that naming varied by region and period, so this Yucatec form is one attested set rather than the whole of ancient Maya usage.
Identity
Position
2 of 19 1
Attributions
Day Count
20 Days 1
Meaning
Literal Meaning
Black conjunction 1
Status
Standing as a Comparative Category
A standard analytic category in the study of religion 1
Learn More
Wo, the Second Month of the Haab

Wo is the second of the nineteen periods of the Haab, the 365-day Maya solar calendar of eighteen twenty-day months plus a final five-day period. Recorded here by its Yucatec name, Wo, with the gloss of the black conjunction, the month is known from the colonial sources and the Classic inscriptions. Like each of the eighteen full months it counts twenty days, and a Maya date names the day by its position within the month, from the seating of the month through its nineteen numbered days, together with the interlocking Tzolk'in day. The month names such as Wo derive from the Yucatec Maya recorded at the conquest; the Classic-period glyphs for the same months are read somewhat differently. These are the features of the Maya solar calendar, one of the two great cycles that the Calendar Round meshes together across a span of fifty-two years.

Wo, sometimes transcribed Uo, is the second month, and unlike Pop its name's meaning is not settled among epigraphers; proposed readings connect it to a frog or toad, an animal that appears in the month's glyph in some inscriptions, though the link to a specific ceremony is documented only from the colonial period rather than from Classic texts. Diego de Landa's sixteenth-century account of Yucatec practice associates the surrounding months with renewal rites carried out by priests and diviners, refurbishing idols and instruments used in divination, though Landa's description groups several months' observances together and modern scholars caution against reading every detail as specific to Wo alone. As with all nineteen Haab periods, Wo's position slowly cycled through the true solar seasons over the centuries because the 365-day vague year carries no leap-day correction.

Wo in the Calendar Round

The name recorded here as Wo appears in older literature as Uo, and it is the second of the eighteen full months. Its meaning is given as the black conjunction, pairing it with Sip, the red conjunction, which follows it; the colour-paired month names are one of the most distinctive features of the Haab list and they recur later in the year in the four storm months, Chen, Yax, Sak and Keh, black, green, white and red.

Those pairings are not decoration. Colour and direction form a single system in Maya thought, with red for east, white for north, black for west and yellow for south, and green at the centre, so a set of colour-marked month names carries a directional order inside the year. How far that order was operative in the calendar rather than only in the naming is not settled, and the atlas does not assert more than the names themselves support.

Structurally Wo behaves like every other full month. It runs from its seating, written 0 Wo, through 19 Wo, and because it is twenty days long and the Tzolk'in day sign also cycles in twenty, its seating carries the same day sign as the seating of Pop before it and of Sip after it.

Wo also illustrates a difficulty in the sources. The colonial Yucatec spellings recorded in the sixteenth century, Uo among them, were fixed by Spanish ears and a Spanish alphabet, while the Classic glyphs were read centuries later by epigraphers working from the signs themselves. The modern spellings used here follow current orthographic conventions for Mayan languages, so a reader comparing an older book with this one will meet the same month under three spellings and should not take them for three months.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Contained In

Haab, Calendars

One of the eighteen twenty day months of the Haab.

Originates in Language

The month names are attested by glyph in Classic Maya inscriptions, and the forms given here are the colonial Yucatec spellings under which they are usually cited. Two layers are involved and should not be collapsed: the glyphs are Classic Maya, the names come from sixteenth-century Yucatec sources, and the modern spellings follow current Mayan orthography rather than the colonial one.

Source Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: An IntroductionJ. Eric S. Thompson
Sources
1. The Maya (9th edition)
Michael D. Coe and Stephen Houston, Thames and Hudson, 2015ch. on Maya arithmetic, writing and the calendarView the Source
2. Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: An Introduction
J. Eric S. Thompson, University of Oklahoma Press, 1962The Haab and the month glyphs
Quote, The Haab and the month glyphs
Phonemic analysis of the month glyphs in pre-Columbian inscriptions shows the names varied considerably from region to region and from period to period, so the colonial Yucatec forms are one attested set rather than the Maya usage.
View the Source
3. Relacion de las cosas de Yucatan
Diego de Landa, Dante S.A., 1864The count of the year and the months
Quote, The count of the year and the months
The Haab month names are known in colonial Yucatec spelling as transcribed in the sixteenth century, and this is the principal source for them and for the ritual associated with each month, including the treatment of Wayeb.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.