George Ivanovich Gurdjieff was a teacher of Armenian and Greek background who taught in Russia, Constantinople, Berlin, Paris and the United States that ordinary human life is lived in a kind of sleep and that waking from it requires deliberate and difficult work on oneself. He called his method the Fourth Way, distinguishing it from the paths of the fakir, the monk and the yogi by insisting it be practised in ordinary life rather than in withdrawal, and it combined self observation, physical movements set to music, and manual work under conditions designed to expose habit. He claimed his teaching came from sources encountered on travels in Central Asia and the Middle East, and those sources have never been identified independently. His year of birth is uncertain and is given variously between 1866 and 1877; the school continued after his death through pupils including P. D. Ouspensky and Jeanne de Salzmann.
Facts
Disputed
Lifespan or FloruitHis own accounts of his birth year varied across his lifetime, and biographers have proposed dates anywhere between 1866 and 1877; no birth record has settled the question, and the earliest commonly cited year is recorded here. Life
Lifespan or Floruit Origins
Place of OriginAlexandropol, Russian Empire (present day Gyumri, Armenia) 1 Learn More
What the Work Actually Asks a Pupil to Do
The starting claim is unflattering. A person has no permanent I, only a crowd of small ones that take turns and each speak in the name of the whole, and ordinary waking life is a form of sleep in which nobody is present to notice. The method attacks that directly. Self observation means watching oneself without correcting or excusing what is seen. Self remembering means holding attention on the observer and the observed at the same time, which pupils reported being able to sustain for seconds at a stretch. Identification, losing oneself in a task or a grievance, is the ordinary condition and the thing being worked against.
Gurdjieff described a person as three centres, moving, emotional and intellectual, which develop unevenly and are usually out of contact with each other. That is why the older paths of the fakir, the monk and the yogi each train one and leave the rest. The Fourth Way trains all three at once and refuses withdrawal: the work is done in ordinary conditions, and at the Prieure near Fontainebleau that meant heavy manual labour, unfamiliar tasks and deliberately awkward arrangements designed to make habit visible. The Movements, dances set to music which often require the limbs to keep different counts at once, exist to make habitual coordination impossible and attention necessary. The enneagram, a nine pointed figure inside a circle, was taught as a diagram of how any process unfolds.
A Lineage Nobody Else Can Find
Gurdjieff said the teaching was not his invention but material gathered on years of travel in Central Asia, Persia, Egypt and Tibet, and Meetings with Remarkable Men tells of a search for a hidden brotherhood, the Sarmoung, and of a monastery where the Movements were preserved. No independent trace of that brotherhood, that monastery or those journeys has ever been produced, and the book reads as instruction rather than as report. Scholars of the material generally treat the account as a teaching device and look instead at the currents he demonstrably moved in, which include Sufi practice, Orthodox Christian asceticism and the theosophical vocabulary current in the Russia of his youth. The atlas records the claim and the absence of evidence for it together, because both are part of what the teaching is.
It spread mainly through pupils who wrote. In Search of the Miraculous, by P. D. Ouspensky, set the system out more clearly than Gurdjieff ever did, and its author had broken with him by then. A. R. Orage carried the work to New York. Jeanne de Salzmann held the Movements together after his death in 1949. The strangest part of the afterlife is the enneagram. He used it as a diagram of process and attached no personality types to it whatever. The nine character types now taught under that name were developed later in the twentieth century by Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo, and the figure has travelled much further in that form than in his.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Attributed Works
Why this is disputed. Gurdjieff himself is the sole source for the Sarmoung Brotherhood, describing it in his own memoir as an ancient esoteric school he encountered in Central Asia and crediting it as the origin of teachings he brought to the West; every later account of the Brotherhood descends from his telling with no independent corroboration. Some students and scholars of Gurdjieff's life read the account as a literary or allegorical framing built on real Sufi and dervish orders he plausibly encountered on his travels, while others take his narrative at face value; no external record of a school by this name has been found.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.