Human Design Profiles
Investigator / Martyr
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Origin 1987
Human Design is a modern synthesis first taught in the early 1990s by Ra Uru Hu, the teaching name adopted by the Canadian Alan Robert Krakower after a self-described experience in Ibiza in 1987, layering a birth chart astrology reading onto the sixty four hexagrams of the I Ching, the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the body's chakras; its typological claims are the system's own, not independently verified. The 1/3 profile pairs a first line Personality Sun, calculated from the moment of birth, with a third line Design Earth, calculated from the sun's position roughly eighty eight days earlier, the conscious and unconscious halves every Human Design chart is said to carry. In this teaching the first line is called the Investigator, needing a firm foundation of study before feeling secure enough to act, while the third line is the Martyr, said to learn only by direct trial, error and experiment. Together the two are nicknamed Investigator or Martyr, a profile the system describes as building competence through research that is then tested, and often discarded, against real experience.
Facts
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern UseDisputed as a description of persons. The one empirical test located, a University of Vienna psychology thesis, could not validate Human Design characterisations against the NEO PI-R personality inventory, and found assent to them consistent with the Barnum effect, under which generic statements are read as personally accurate. 3 Contested or Appropriated Modern UseThe I Ching of China, the chakra teaching of India, Kabbalah and astrology are drawn on here inside a scheme assembled in 1987 and offered as an instrument of psychological counselling. The four traditions it draws on are old; the arrangement that joins them is not, and none of them produced it. 2 Origins
Origin Period1987 2Tradition: Human Design (Ra Uru Hu, 1987) Origin PeriodThe Investigator / Martyr profile, one of the twelve profiles formed by pairing two of the system's six lines, belongs to the Human Design system, synthesized in 1987 out of the I Ching, the chakra teaching, Kabbalah and astrology. 2 Lines
First LineSourced to the subject's own account Second LineSourced to the subject's own account Learn More
The Profile in the Human Design Model
The 1/3 profile (Investigator / Martyr) is one of the twelve profiles of Human Design, a modern esoteric system originated in 1987 by Ra Uru Hu and presented here as a contemporary framework rather than ancient wisdom. A profile is formed from two of the six lines, a scheme the system borrows from the six lines of an I Ching hexagram and reads psychologically: the profile pairs a conscious line with an unconscious one to give an archetypal role. The 1/3 profile joins the roles named Investigator / Martyr. The line names and their meanings are Human Design's own twentieth-century reading, not a claim inherited from the Chinese classic whose six-line figures suggested the structure; they are described here as the system presents them, not as verified fact.
Human Design's own teaching gives each of the six lines a role: the first line, Investigator, is described as needing a solid personal foundation, built through study or research, before it feels safe to act; the third line, Martyr or Adaptor, is described as learning instead through direct trial and error, bonding with others through shared experience rather than shared ideas. The 1/3 profile combines a conscious need to investigate before moving with an unconscious pattern of learning by getting it wrong first, which practitioners of the system commonly describe as an investigative, somewhat solitary way of testing the world that circles back to research after each attempt, rather than a profile that settles into either mode alone.
Lines One and Three in the Chinese Commentaries
A Human Design profile pairs two of six line positions, a structure taken from the six lines of an I Ching hexagram. The Chinese commentarial tradition has a great deal to say about those positions, and it is not what Human Design says.
What the commentaries say about these two
In the classical Yijing commentaries, the first line is the bottom of the figure, the beginning of a situation, and is generally read as obscure, undeveloped and not yet in a position to act. The third line is the top of the lower trigram, a transitional place, and the commentaries repeatedly describe it as a position of difficulty or danger, caught between the lower situation and the upper.
Those readings are traditional, they are attached to positions within the hexagram, and they are about the situation the hexagram describes rather than about a person.
What Human Design does with them
Human Design assigns each of the six lines a role name and reads a person's profile from a pair of them. The role names and their meanings are the system's own, published by Ra Uru Hu in 1987. They are not translations of the commentarial positions and should not be read as a claim about Chinese tradition.
The pairing rule
Of the thirty ordered pairs of distinct lines, Human Design uses twelve: exactly those whose lines are two or three positions apart. That constraint is structural and is described in the articles on the other profiles.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Disciplines That Use This
The twelve profiles read from the conscious and unconscious lines.
Sources
1. The Human Design System
Ra Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower), Human Design America, 1992The 1/3 profileView the Source 2. Über den Tellerrand, ein Blick ins Human Design System (HDS)
Petra Stute, Virineya Würgler and Johnny Würgler, Springer, Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz 24 (2021), pp. 50-51, 2021p. 50: the four systems synthesised, and the use made of the synthesisView the Source 3. Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik unter dem Aspekt des Barnum-Effekts
Katharina Freistetter, Akademiker Verlag, Vienna (University of Vienna diploma thesis in psychology, 2012); ISBN 978-3-639-46969-1, 2013on the Human Design characterisations tested against the NEO PI-R
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.