Katharina Freistetter's diploma thesis, submitted in psychology at the University of Vienna and subsequently published, is the only located empirical test of Human Design against a standard, independently validated personality inventory: characterisations produced by Human Design methods could not be validated against the NEO PI-R, and assent to them was found consistent with the Barnum effect, the tendency to accept vague, generalized statements as personally accurate. That direct empirical test, run under academic supervision, is the record's real evidentiary basis. This record states its own limit plainly: the thesis text itself was not consulted directly for this citation, only the bibliographic record and the reported finding as carried in a German language encyclopedia entry on Human Design, so a fact citing it should be read as asserting nothing beyond that reported finding. Use it for this specific empirical result and nothing beyond it.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The only empirical test of Human Design located anywhere, a University of Vienna psychology diploma thesis; characterisations produced by Human Design methods could not be validated against the NEO PI-R personality inventory, and assent to them was found consistent with the Barnum effect. This record's bibliographic detail and finding were verified from a citation to it in a German language encyclopedia entry rather than from the thesis text itself, so nothing beyond the reported finding is asserted from it. NotesThe only empirical test of Human Design located anywhere. Characterisations produced by Human Design methods could not be validated against the NEO PI-R personality inventory, and assent to them was found consistent with the Barnum effect. Primary academic research, supervised at the University of Vienna and subsequently published. Disclosure: the bibliographic record and the reported finding were verified from the citation in the German-language encyclopedia entry on Human Design; the thesis text itself was not consulted, and the property rows citing it assert nothing beyond the finding as reported.
Citation
AuthorKatharina Freistetter
PublisherAkademiker Verlag, Vienna (University of Vienna diploma thesis in psychology, 2012); ISBN 978-3-639-46969-1
Publication Year2013
Source TypeThesis
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Vienna, Cities This source names Vienna directly: "in psychology at the University of Vienna and subsequently published, is the only located empirical test of Human Design against a standard, independently validated personality inventory..."
Claims Backed By This Source (65 claims)
This source backs 65 claims across the atlas. As facts: 41 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Human Design Profiles, 24 claims: 12 well-attested, 12 general references.
- Categories, 15 claims: 10 well-attested, 5 general references.
- Human Design Types, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 5 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Psi Phenomena, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.