Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Human Design Profiles

Martyr / Role Model

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1987

The 3/6 profile is one of twelve profiles in Human Design, a modern system Ra Uru Hu began teaching in the early 1990s after a self-described 1987 experience in Ibiza, combining birth chart astrology with the I Ching, the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the chakras. It pairs a third line Personality Sun with a sixth line Design Earth, calculated from the birth moment and from roughly eighty eight days before it. The third line is the Martyr, learning by trial and error, while the sixth line is the Role Model, described in the teaching as living through three phases, an early period of trial similar to a third line, a middle period of withdrawal and observation, and a late period of living as a visible example to others. The pairing is described as a life that starts in experimentation before settling, later, into the more detached, exemplary role the sixth line is said to carry.

Facts
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
Disputed as a description of persons. The one empirical test located, a University of Vienna psychology thesis, could not validate Human Design characterisations against the NEO PI-R personality inventory, and found assent to them consistent with the Barnum effect, under which generic statements are read as personally accurate. 3
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
The I Ching of China, the chakra teaching of India, Kabbalah and astrology are drawn on here inside a scheme assembled in 1987 and offered as an instrument of psychological counselling. The four traditions it draws on are old; the arrangement that joins them is not, and none of them produced it. 2
Origins
Origin Period
1987 2Tradition: Human Design (Ra Uru Hu, 1987)
Origin Period
The Martyr / Role Model profile, one of the twelve profiles formed by pairing two of the system's six lines, belongs to the Human Design system, synthesized in 1987 out of the I Ching, the chakra teaching, Kabbalah and astrology. 2
Lines
First LineSourced to the subject's own account
Line 3, Martyr 1
Second LineSourced to the subject's own account
Line 6, Role Model 1
Learn More
The Profile in the Human Design Model

The 3/6 profile (Martyr / Role Model) is one of the twelve profiles of Human Design, a modern esoteric system originated in 1987 by Ra Uru Hu and presented here as a contemporary framework rather than ancient wisdom. A profile is formed from two of the six lines, a scheme the system borrows from the six lines of an I Ching hexagram and reads psychologically: the profile pairs a conscious line with an unconscious one to give an archetypal role. The 3/6 profile joins the roles named Martyr / Role Model. The line names and their meanings are Human Design's own twentieth-century reading, not a claim inherited from the Chinese classic whose six-line figures suggested the structure; they are described here as the system presents them, not as verified fact.

Human Design describes the third line, Martyr or Adaptor, as learning through direct trial and error; the sixth line, Role Model, is described as living a distinctive three part life, resembling the third line's own trial and error approach for roughly the first thirty years, withdrawing after that into a more detached, observational phase often called being on the roof, and only after about fifty settling into the objective, lived wisdom the line is named for. The 3/6 profile is therefore described, in the system's own framework, as doubly shaped by trial and error, since the third line's own nature and the sixth line's early phase are held to reinforce rather than balance one another until the later shift comes.

Lines Three and Six, a Correspondence Pair

This profile joins the third and sixth line positions, which classical Yijing commentary holds to correspond, and it is therefore one of the three Human Design profiles whose structure genuinely descends from the Chinese source.

Correspondence

The six lines of a hexagram are read as two stacked trigrams, and commentary holds that a line of the lower trigram corresponds with the line occupying the same relative position in the upper: one with four, two with five, three with six. The relation is standard doctrine and much older than any modern system.

The positions themselves

The third line is the top of the lower trigram, a transitional and, in the commentaries, characteristically difficult position. The sixth line is the top of the whole figure, beyond the ruling position, and is commonly read as excess, withdrawal, or a situation that has run past its proper end.

Both readings describe a position within a situation. Neither describes a person.

The modern layer

Human Design attaches a role name to each of the six lines and reads a pair of them as a personality. Those names and that reading are Ra Uru Hu's, published in 1987. This atlas records the structural inheritance, which is real, and records the interpretation as a modern addition rather than as Chinese material.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Disciplines That Use This

The twelve profiles read from the conscious and unconscious lines.

Source The Human Design SystemRa Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower)
Sources
1. The Human Design System
Ra Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower), Human Design America, 1992The 3/6 profileView the Source
2. Über den Tellerrand, ein Blick ins Human Design System (HDS)
Petra Stute, Virineya Würgler and Johnny Würgler, Springer, Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz 24 (2021), pp. 50-51, 2021p. 50: the four systems synthesised, and the use made of the synthesisView the Source
3. Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik unter dem Aspekt des Barnum-Effekts
Katharina Freistetter, Akademiker Verlag, Vienna (University of Vienna diploma thesis in psychology, 2012); ISBN 978-3-639-46969-1, 2013on the Human Design characterisations tested against the NEO PI-R

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.