Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Human Design Profiles

Role Model / Martyr

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin 1987

The 6/3 profile is one of twelve profiles in Human Design, a modern system Ra Uru Hu began teaching in the early 1990s after a self-described 1987 experience in Ibiza, combining birth chart astrology with the I Ching, the Kabbalistic Tree of Life and the chakras. It pairs a sixth line Personality Sun with a third line Design Earth, the reverse ordering of the 3/6 profile. The sixth line is the Role Model, moving through an early trial phase, a middle withdrawal, and a late phase of exemplary living, while the third line is the Martyr, learning by direct trial and error. The teaching describes this pairing as a conscious life aimed at eventually setting an example, built on an unconscious habit of learning only by testing things directly.

Facts
Contested Use
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
Disputed as a description of persons. The one empirical test located, a University of Vienna psychology thesis, could not validate Human Design characterisations against the NEO PI-R personality inventory, and found assent to them consistent with the Barnum effect, under which generic statements are read as personally accurate. 3
Contested or Appropriated Modern Use
The I Ching of China, the chakra teaching of India, Kabbalah and astrology are drawn on here inside a scheme assembled in 1987 and offered as an instrument of psychological counselling. The four traditions it draws on are old; the arrangement that joins them is not, and none of them produced it. 2
Origins
Origin Period
1987 2Tradition: Human Design (Ra Uru Hu, 1987)
Origin Period
The Role Model / Martyr profile, one of the twelve profiles formed by pairing two of the system's six lines, belongs to the Human Design system, synthesized in 1987 out of the I Ching, the chakra teaching, Kabbalah and astrology. 2
Lines
First LineSourced to the subject's own account
Line 6, Role Model 1
Second LineSourced to the subject's own account
Line 3, Martyr 1
Learn More
The Profile in the Human Design Model

The 6/3 profile (Role Model / Martyr) is one of the twelve profiles of Human Design, a modern esoteric system originated in 1987 by Ra Uru Hu and presented here as a contemporary framework rather than ancient wisdom. A profile is formed from two of the six lines, a scheme the system borrows from the six lines of an I Ching hexagram and reads psychologically: the profile pairs a conscious line with an unconscious one to give an archetypal role. The 6/3 profile joins the roles named Role Model / Martyr. The line names and their meanings are Human Design's own twentieth-century reading, not a claim inherited from the Chinese classic whose six-line figures suggested the structure; they are described here as the system presents them, not as verified fact.

Human Design describes the sixth line, Role Model, as living a three part life, resembling trial and error through roughly the first thirty years, withdrawing into a more detached, observational phase often called being on the roof through about fifty, and only afterward settling into the line's objective, lived wisdom; the third line, Martyr or Adaptor, is described as learning throughout life by direct trial and error, discovering by getting things wrong what actually works. The 6/3 profile is therefore described, in the system's own framework, as doubly shaped by trial and error, since the sixth line's own early phase already resembles the third line's habitual mode, and the eventual shift into role model authority is held to arrive only once both layers of trial and error have run their course.

Lines Six and Three, a Correspondence Reversed

This profile takes the sixth and third line positions of a hexagram, the same pair as another profile in the set but in the opposite order, and the pair is one of the three the Chinese tradition holds to correspond.

Correspondence

A hexagram is read as two stacked trigrams, and classical Yijing commentary holds a line of the lower trigram to correspond with the line in the same relative position of the upper: one with four, two with five, three with six. Human Design's six profiles whose lines are three positions apart are exactly those three relations, each taken in both orders.

The positions themselves

The sixth line is the top of the figure, past the ruling position, and is commonly read as excess or as a situation that has gone beyond its end. The third line is the top of the lower trigram, transitional, and characteristically read as difficult or exposed.

Ordered pairs

The twelve profiles are ordered, the two numbers being taken from different parts of the calculated chart, which is why six and three is a distinct profile from three and six.

The modern layer

The role names on the six lines and the reading of a pair as a personality are Ra Uru Hu's, published in 1987. Classical commentary reads lines as positions in a situation rather than as human types, and this atlas records the two layers separately.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Disciplines That Use This

The twelve profiles read from the conscious and unconscious lines.

Source The Human Design SystemRa Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower)
Sources
1. The Human Design System
Ra Uru Hu (Alan Robert Krakower), Human Design America, 1992The 6/3 profileView the Source
2. Über den Tellerrand, ein Blick ins Human Design System (HDS)
Petra Stute, Virineya Würgler and Johnny Würgler, Springer, Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Schweiz 24 (2021), pp. 50-51, 2021p. 50: the four systems synthesised, and the use made of the synthesisView the Source
3. Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik unter dem Aspekt des Barnum-Effekts
Katharina Freistetter, Akademiker Verlag, Vienna (University of Vienna diploma thesis in psychology, 2012); ISBN 978-3-639-46969-1, 2013on the Human Design characterisations tested against the NEO PI-R

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.