Laura Engelstein's history of the Skoptsy, published by Cornell University Press in 1999, and the standard scholarly account of the sect in English language historical writing. Built around nineteenth century interrogation and trial records from a Skoptsy community, prosecuted by the tsarist state for the ritual castration its own members held as a mark of readiness for a promised heavenly kingdom.
Facts
Subject Matter
Religious Subject MatterThe Skoptsy's own beliefs and self-understanding, read from surviving interrogation and trial testimony rather than from any theology the sect wrote down for itself. 1 Scholarly ReceptionStanding as the field's reference point since its 1999 publication, cited across later Russian religious history for treating the Skoptsy's own reasoning on its own terms rather than only as a case study in what the tsarist state prosecuted as a crime. 1 Production
Publication Year AuthorLaura Engelstein, historian of Russia. 1 Place of OriginIthaca, New York (Cornell University Press). 1 Learn More
The Standard Study Reads Interrogation Records as Evidence of Belief
Laura Engelstein's Castration and the Heavenly Kingdom: A Russian Folktale, published by Cornell University Press in 1999, is the standard scholarly account of the Skoptsy in English language historical writing. Engelstein, a historian of Russia, builds the book around a set of nineteenth century court records, the interrogation and trial of a Skoptsy community, preserved because the tsarist state periodically prosecuted the sect for the same practice of ritual castration its own members considered a mark of election for a promised heavenly kingdom.
The book's method is part of what makes it the field's reference point. Rather than treating the sect only as a curiosity, Engelstein reads the surviving testimony for what it can show about selfhood, the body and religious conviction in a peasant and merchant milieu the historical record rarely lets speak for itself. The Skoptsy did not write theology in the ordinary sense. They left interrogation transcripts, and Engelstein's study takes that unusual archive seriously as evidence of belief, not only as evidence of a crime.
The book has stood as the field's reference point since its 1999 publication, still the starting point any serious account of the sect returns to, because it treats the Skoptsy's own reasoning on its own terms rather than only as a case the tsarist state chose to prosecute. An outside academic study rather than a Skoptsy text itself, it remains the most careful reconstruction available of what adherents believed they were doing, and why.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names English Language directly: "scholarly account of the sect in English language historical writing."
Belongs to Tradition
Skoptsy, Denominations An outside academic study, not a Skoptsy text: the standard scholarly reconstruction of the sect's own beliefs from surviving court testimony, not a document the Skoptsy themselves produced.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.