Psi Phenomena
Remote Viewing
Extrasensory Perception
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Remote viewing is the claimed ability to describe a distant or hidden location or object using only a set of coordinates or other minimal cue, without travelling there or receiving normal information about it. The term and testing protocol were developed at Stanford Research Institute from 1972 by physicists Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ, working with subjects including Ingo Swann and Pat Price, in research that drew CIA and later military funding and eventually became known by its final codename, Star Gate. The 22 year, roughly 20 million dollar program was terminated in 1995 after an outside evaluation by statistician Jessica Utts and psychologist Raymond Hyman produced a rare, well documented case of two experts examining the same data and reaching opposite conclusions, Utts finding the statistical evidence persuasive and Hyman finding it inconclusive, with both agreeing the program had no practical intelligence value.
Facts
Disputed
Key ExperimentThe 1972-1995 SAIC/Star Gate program, roughly 20 million dollars in U.S. government funding across 22 years, tested remote viewing for intelligence applications. 1 The American Institutes for Research's 1995 evaluation, An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications, examined the government-funded remote viewing programme originating in Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ's Stanford Research Institute protocol of the 1970s. Both evaluators on the review, Jessica Utts and Ray Hyman of the University of Oregon, agreed the programme's output had no confirmed operational intelligence value and recommended termination, which the sponsoring agencies carried out in 1995. Where they disagreed, having examined the identical laboratory statistics underlying the operational programme, was whether those statistics showed a genuine anomalous effect worth further scientific study, Utts holding they did and Hyman holding methodological weaknesses in the underlying experiments were sufficient to explain them. The method for both conclusions was statistical and documentary review of the same body of records rather than a new experiment. Because the operational and scientific questions came apart, a shared recommendation to end the programme alongside an unresolved disagreement about the underlying science, the key experiment is recorded as debated on the scientific question even though the programme itself is closed. Replication StatusJessica Utts and Raymond Hyman reviewed the same Star Gate data in 1995 and reached opposite conclusions, Utts finding the statistics persuasive of an anomalous effect and Hyman finding them inconclusive; the program was closed regardless as operationally useless. 1 Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ developed the remote viewing protocol at the Stanford Research Institute from 1972 and published it openly in 1976. The American Institutes for Research's 1995 An Evaluation of Remote Viewing: Research and Applications paired Jessica Utts, who concluded a statistical anomaly was real and worth further study, with Raymond Hyman of the University of Oregon, who concluded the same anomalies had not been shown to be psychic in origin and could plausibly result from methodological weaknesses in the underlying experiments. The method on both sides was statistical review of the same published experimental record rather than a new experiment, and both reviewers had access to identical data. Because two qualified specialist reviewers examined the same evidence side by side and reached opposite conclusions in reports both published without reconciliation, the AIR review stands as a rare, fully documented case of expert disagreement over one shared body of evidence rather than a result either side's own reading has settled. Position Profile
Principal CriticRaymond Hyman, University of Oregon, co-authored the 1995 evaluation and concluded the statistical anomalies had not been shown to be psychic in origin. 1 Terminology
Term CoinedCoined by subject Ingo Swann around 1971 and adopted as the SRI program's working term from 1972. 2 Research
Principal ResearcherHarold Puthoff and Russell Targ, Stanford Research Institute (SRI International), developed the remote viewing protocol from 1972 and published it openly in 1976. 2 Learn More
From a Psychic Studio to a Classified Program
Remote viewing has a specific, datable origin. Around 1971, the artist and self-described psychic Ingo Swann, working informally with the American Society for Psychical Research in New York, proposed the term for a controlled procedure in which a subject would attempt to describe a real target location known only by a set of geographic coordinates or a sealed photograph held by someone else.
In 1972, physicists Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ at SRI International (then Stanford Research Institute) began formal experiments with Swann and other subjects, most famously Pat Price, a retired police commissioner. Early success, real or perceived, in a series of trials against secret U.S. government sites drew the interest of the Central Intelligence Agency, and funding grew across the following two decades to include the Defense Intelligence Agency and other agencies, eventually run under the classified program name Star Gate. Over 22 years the program cost the government roughly twenty million dollars and involved a shifting roster of viewers attempting to describe hostage locations, foreign weapons facilities, and other intelligence targets from Washington offices, entirely from coordinates or codewords, with no travel and no normal sensory access to the target.
Two Experts, One Data Set, Two Conclusions
The CIA closed Star Gate in 1995 after commissioning an outside evaluation from the American Institutes for Research, whose report drew on two named specialists chosen to represent both sides of the argument: Jessica Utts, a statistics professor sympathetic to a psi interpretation, and Raymond Hyman, a psychologist and prominent skeptic of parapsychology. Working from the same body of remote-viewing trial data, Utts concluded the statistical evidence supported the reality of some anomalous perceptual effect, and Hyman concluded the anomalies, however statistically unusual, had not been shown to be genuinely psychic in origin rather than an artifact of methodology. Both agreed the program had produced no result of practical intelligence value, and the CIA terminated it on that basis regardless of the theoretical disagreement.
The Utts-Hyman split has become one of the most cited episodes in psi research precisely because it shows two qualified reviewers, working from identical data under a shared evaluation process, unable to agree on whether an effect existed at all, a vivid illustration of how contested the statistical evidence in this field remains even among specialists who accept the raw numbers.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Parapsychology is the research programme that investigates this claimed phenomenon using controlled experimental methods. The relation records that parapsychology studies this claim, not that the claim itself is established.
Related To
Studied By
Principal investigator of the Stanford Research Institute programme from 1972. His own principal-critic fact records the Marks and Kammann critique of the programme's methodology, which is where that dispute is carried, not on this membership.
Swann named the practice and proposed the coordinate protocol that shaped the programme, as his own term-coined fact already records. The dispute over the programme's results is carried on Remote Viewing's own replication-status fact, not on this membership.
Co-investigator of the Stanford Research Institute programme and its most persistent public advocate. His own replication-status fact records the Marks and Kammann critique that the reported effect vanished once session-order cues were removed from the transcripts, which is where that dispute is carried.
SRI International hosted the government funded remote viewing programme from 1972 until its transfer and eventual end in the early 1990s. Remote Viewing's own replication-status fact, already debated, carries the Hyman/Utts dispute over what the programme's results show.
The experiments that established the outdoor site protocol and the term's scientific profile. Whether their results hold up is carried on the experiments' own replication-status and principal-critic facts, both already debated, not on this membership.
Sources
Essays About This Entity (1 essay)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.