Wutai is the seat of Manjushri, and the only major Chinese sacred mountain where Han Chinese and Tibetan Buddhism have coexisted institutionally for centuries.
Manjushri, and an unusual kind of evidence
Five flat-topped peaks in northern Shanxi, identified as the earthly dwelling of Manjushri, the bodhisattva of wisdom.
What makes this unusual is that the identification was known in India itself. Indian and Central Asian pilgrims were travelling to Wutai by the seventh century, a Chinese mountain drawing pilgrimage from the homeland of the religion, which reverses the normal direction of Buddhist traffic entirely and is very well attested.
The two communities
More than fifty monasteries stand on the mountain, and they belong to two distinct Buddhist worlds:
- Han Chinese Mahayana monasteries, in the mainstream Chinese tradition.
- Tibetan and Mongolian Gelug monasteries, with Pusading as the principal centre.
The Gelug presence dates substantially from Qing patronage, the Manchu emperors cultivated Tibetan Buddhism as an instrument of policy toward Tibet and Mongolia, and the Qianlong emperor in particular invested heavily at Wutai, converting Chinese monasteries to Tibetan use.
So the arrangement is not an accident of piety; it is partly a residue of imperial statecraft. It has nonetheless lasted, and monks of both traditions live on the mountain now.
The oldest timber buildings in China
Wutai holds the two oldest surviving wooden buildings in the country:
- The main hall of Nanchan Temple, 782.
- The east hall of Foguang Temple, 857.
Both were identified in the late 1930s by Liang Sicheng and Lin Huiyin, working on temple architecture at a point when Japanese scholars had asserted that no Tang timber building survived in China and that one had to go to Nara to see Tang architecture.
Finding Foguang, by following a Dunhuang cave painting that depicted it, was a nationally significant piece of scholarship, undertaken in wartime conditions. Lin Huiyin, who was tubercular, located the dated inscription on a beam.
The cost of listing
UNESCO inscribed the mountain in 2009.
Residents complained in 2008 that they had been moved off the mountain and away from their livelihoods in preparation for the nomination, shops, guesthouses and homes cleared to produce a site that would present well.
This recurs across heritage listing at places that are still lived in, and it is worth recording alongside the inscription rather than separately from it. The people removed were, in many cases, the descendants of those who had serviced the pilgrimage for generations.