Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sacred Sites

Serpent Mound

Indigenous (Ohio Valley) Sites

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

An earthen effigy in southern Ohio in the form of a snake, some four hundred metres long, uncoiling along a ridge with its jaws open around an oval and its tail wound into a spiral. It is the largest surviving effigy mound in the world. It contains no burials and yielded no artefacts of its own, so its purpose is inferred rather than known; the head aligns with the summer-solstice sunset and the coils have been read against other solar and lunar events. Descendant peoples, the Shawnee among them, hold ties to the mound builders of the Ohio valley. It is managed as a park and stands on the United States tentative list for World Heritage nomination.

Facts
Geography
Latitude
39 degrees north 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Longitude
83.4 degrees west 2
Approximate reference point, rounded to one decimal place; this marks the site's general location for a map, not a survey-grade or precise boundary measurement.
Site
Type of Site
Mound or earthwork 1
Type of Site
Geoglyph or ground marking 1
Type of Site Detail
Prehistoric earthwork effigy in southern Ohio built with no burials or associated artefacts of its own, its four hundred metre coiled serpent form aligned toward the summer solstice sunset, and now a state park on the United States tentative World Heritage list. 2
Attributions
Tradition
Indigenous (Ohio valley) 1
Status
Status Today
Standing, but maintained as a museum or heritage monument 1
UNESCO World Heritage
On a National Tentative List 3
On the United States' tentative list since 2008, one of nine Ohio earthworks proposed together; not part of the separate Hopewell Ceremonial Earthworks inscription of 2023, which did not include it.
Origins
Country
United States 1
Region
North America 1
Location
Location of Serpent Mound Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guam Guatemala Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tanzania Thailand Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
Learn More
Whose Serpent, and from When

The largest effigy mound in the world is also one of the hardest to date, and one of the most fought-over in the present.

The dating problem. It has no burials and no artefacts of its own, so it cannot be dated from its contents. Nineteenth-century investigators tied it to the Adena culture of around two thousand years ago, on the strength of nearby burial mounds. Radiocarbon work in the 1990s, on charcoal from the body of the mound, pointed instead to about 1070 and the later Fort Ancient culture. More recent excavation has reopened the older date, and proposed that the mound was built in stages. The honest statement is that its age is unsettled and the argument continues.

The alignments. The one thing most investigators agree on is that it is oriented: the open jaws and the oval align with the summer-solstice sunset, and the coils have been argued to track other solar and lunar events. What the serpent meant to its builders (a specific being, a calendar, a boundary), is inference.

The contest now. Serpent Mound has become a magnet for New Age and neo-pagan gatherings, drawn by ideas about earth energies that have nothing to do with the people who built it, and these proceed without the sanction of the Shawnee and other descendant nations who hold ties to the Ohio-valley mound builders. When the Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Earthworks were inscribed as World Heritage in 2023, Serpent Mound was deliberately left out, because it postdates the Hopewell; it is now being advanced for a listing of its own.

An Alignment Built into the Curves

Serpent Mound's coiled form is not just a shape; part of it lines up with a specific point on the horizon that only happens once a year.

An alignment built into the curves

The mound's head and the oval form near it are positioned such that the head aligns with the sunset position at the summer solstice, an alignment argued by some researchers as deliberate astronomical design rather than coincidence, though as with many such claims at effigy and earthwork sites, intentionality is inferred from geometry rather than confirmed by any accompanying written record.

An effigy, not a burial mound

Unlike many prehistoric North American mounds built primarily for burial, Serpent Mound contains no significant burials of its own, distinguishing it as an effigy mound, a large-scale earthen sculpture built in the shape of an animal, a form found at a number of other sites in the Ohio and upper Mississippi valleys but rarely at this scale or level of preservation.

As this entry's companion article covers

The unresolved debate over which culture actually built the mound, with radiocarbon evidence pointing variously toward the Fort Ancient culture or the earlier Adena culture, and what that uncertainty means for dating the site with confidence, is addressed directly in this entry's companion article rather than repeated here.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Belongs to Tradition

Contained In

Related To

Cahokia, Sacred Sites

Two monumental earthworks of the North American eastern woodlands. What relation, if any, held between the traditions that raised them is not established.

Sources
1. A new multistage construction chronology for the Great Serpent Mound, USA
Edward W. Herrmann and others, Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014On the disputed dating and the multistage construction of the effigy
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (online academic reference)
Encyclopaedia Britannica editors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 2024View the Source
3. UNESCO World Heritage List
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO World Heritage CentreView the Source
Serpent Mound: World Heritage nomination documentation
Ohio History Connection and the Newark Earthworks Center, Ohio State University, 2024On the tentative-list nomination and exclusion from the Hopewell inscriptionView the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.