Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Scholarly Disciplines

Archaeobotany

Natural Science

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Origin from 1875

The identification of ancient plant remains, seeds, charcoal and pollen recovered from excavated soil, used to reconstruct what a community grew, gathered or offered. A material check on what a text claims was used in a rite.

Facts
Identity
Field Category
Natural science 1
Parent Field
Botany 1
Method
Method
identification and quantification of plant remains, seeds, pollen and charcoal recovered from excavated soil 2
Origins
Emerged As Named Discipline
from 1875 2
Subject
Subject
the plant material an ancient community grew, gathered, stored, burned or offered, recovered from the ground it left it in 2
Learn More
Oswald Heer and the Seeds the Swiss Lake Dwellings Kept

Archaeobotany identifies and quantifies the plant remains an excavation recovers, seeds, charred grain, pollen grains, wood charcoal and impressions left in fired clay, and uses that material to reconstruct what a community grew, gathered, stored, traded or burned. The discipline's founding case is the Swiss botanist Oswald Heer's study of waterlogged plant remains from the Neolithic and Bronze Age lake dwelling sites uncovered after the unusually low water levels of the winter of 1853 to 1854. Heer catalogued the preserved seeds and identified cultivated cereals, flax and fruit alongside gathered wild plants, publishing his findings from 1865 and giving archaeology for the first time a systematic method for reading plant evidence rather than treating it as incidental debris.

The atlas draws on archaeobotany wherever a sacred site's own material record is asked to speak to ritual use. Carbonized grain in a temple deposit, cultivated versus wild seed ratios at a shrine, or pollen sequences from a sacred grove are the kind of evidence that can support or undercut a claimed offering practice independently of what any later text says was offered. Archaeobotanical reports are accordingly treated as primary evidence for practice, distinct from and sometimes in tension with scriptural description of the same rite.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Branch Of

Open Questions Needing This

Sources
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.