John Mbiti was a Kenyan theologian and scholar of African religions, and this book, published by Heinemann, was an early and influential attempt by an African scholar himself, rather than an outside colonial observer, to systematically describe African traditional religious and philosophical concepts across many different peoples. Its strength is that Mbiti wrote from within African intellectual life, pushing back against earlier dismissive Western accounts of African religion. Its limit, raised by later African scholars themselves, is that Mbiti's method of generalizing shared concepts across hundreds of distinct African peoples and languages can flatten real differences between specific traditions, so a claim sourced here about African religious thought broadly should be checked against a source focused on the specific people or region in question where precision matters.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
John Mbiti's foundational survey of traditional African religions and philosophy, one of the first attempts at a pan-African synthesis of belief in God, spirits, ancestors and time, written by a Kenyan theologian; a 1969 synthesis across hundreds of distinct African traditions, and later scholarship has critiqued its generalizing approach, so a claim specific to one people or region needs a source focused on that tradition alongside it. NotesJohn Mbiti's foundational survey of traditional African religions and philosophy, one of the first attempts at a pan-African synthesis of belief in God, spirits, ancestors and time, written by a Kenyan theologian. Use for established facts as this influential foundational work states them; a 1969 synthesis across hundreds of distinct African traditions, and later scholarship has critiqued its pan-African generalizing approach, so a claim specific to one people or region needs a source focused on that tradition alongside it.
Citation
AuthorJohn S. Mbiti
PublisherHeinemann
Publication Year1969
Source TypeScholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (73 claims)
This source backs 73 claims across the atlas. As facts: 40 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 18 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Deities, 35 claims: 24 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 8 general references.
- Religions, 9 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 3 general references.
- Doctrines, 8 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Calendars, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Culture Groups, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Practices, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Language Families, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.