Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

An Introduction to the Apocrypha

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Bruce Metzger's introduction works through the deuterocanonical and apocryphal books one at a time, giving each its own documented textual and historical background rather than treating the Apocrypha as a single undifferentiated collection. That book-by-book method, checkable against the specific manuscript and canonical history it recounts for each text, is the introduction's real evidentiary basis and the reason it remains the standard reference decades after its 1957 publication. This record has not independently traced later scholarly revision of Metzger's specific claims about any one book. Use it for the textual history and canonical status of a named deuterocanonical or apocryphal book; a claim resting on that book's doctrinal content needs the text itself alongside this introduction.

Facts
Citation
Author
Bruce M. Metzger
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1957
URL
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/an-introduction-to-the-apocrypha-9780195023404
Source Type
book
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Bruce Metzger's introduction working through the deuterocanonical and apocryphal books one at a time, giving each its own documented textual and historical background, the reason it remains the standard reference decades after its 1957 publication.
Notes
The standard scholarly introduction to the deuterocanonical and apocryphal books, book by book.
Claims Backed By This Source (232 claims)

This source backs 232 claims across the atlas. As facts: 177 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 33 held Differently. Plus 21 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 176 claims: 126 well-attested, 33 held Differently, 17 general references.
  • Articles, 36 claims: 36 well-attested.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Figures, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Archangels, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Doctrines, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.