Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Romila Thapar's Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, published by Oxford University Press in 1961, is the standard scholarly study of the Mauryan emperor Ashoka's reign and his patronage of Buddhism, built substantially on Thapar's own reading of Ashoka's edicts, the rock and pillar inscriptions that survive as his own words rather than later legend. Thapar is among the most influential historians of ancient India, and this early work established the critical, epigraphy first approach to Ashoka that later scholarship in the field has generally followed. Its strength is that grounding in Ashoka's own inscriptions rather than in the later Buddhist hagiographical tradition that surrounds him, letting the book separate what Ashoka himself claimed from what pious legend added afterward. Its limit is that it was written over sixty years ago and Thapar herself substantially revised parts of the argument in her own later work, so a claim about the Mauryan decline specifically benefits from checking against her subsequent revisions.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Romila Thapar's Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, published by Oxford University Press in 1961, is the standard scholarly account by one of the most cited historians of ancient India, still assigned decades later, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Romila Thapar's scholarly study of Ashoka and the decline of the Mauryan empire.
Citation
Author
Romila Thapar
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1961
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

India, Countries

This source names India directly: "Thapar is among the most influential historians of ancient India, and this early work established the critical, epigraphy first approach to Ashoka that later scholarship in the field has generally..."

Source Asoka and the Decline of the MauryasRomila Thapar
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Religious Events, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Councils and Synods, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.