Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Councils and Synods

The Third Buddhist Council

Buddhist Councils

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The council said to have met at Pataliputta under the patronage of the emperor Ashoka and the presidency of Moggaliputta Tissa, to expel monks who had entered the order for the wealth attached to royal favour and to settle points of doctrine. Its most consequential act in the Theravada account is the sending of missions beyond India, including the one to Sri Lanka that carried the Pali canon there. The council is recorded in Theravada sources and is largely absent from those of other schools, which is one reason its scope and even its occurrence are debated.

Facts
The Event
Convened or Ordered By
Convened under the patronage of Ashoka and presided over by the elder Moggaliputta Tissa. 1
When It Happened
Traditionally placed in the reign of the emperor Ashoka, commonly dated to around 250 BCE. 2
Where It Happened
Pataliputta, the Mauryan capital, near modern Patna. 2
Principal Parties
The elder Moggaliputta-Tissa, presiding under the patronage of the emperor Ashoka, who convened the council to expel bhikkhus holding heretical views from the sangha and to compile the Kathavatthu refuting them. 2
Disputed
How Its Legacy Is Contested
The council is recorded in Theravada sources and largely absent from those of other schools, so both its scope and its occurrence are disputed; Peter Harvey's An Introduction to Buddhism (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2013) notes that Ashoka's own edicts mention a schism and discipline in the order but do not themselves describe a council of this kind. 4
Ashoka's own edicts mention a schism and discipline in the order but do not describe a council of this kind.
Consequences
Lasting Consequence
Missions sent beyond India, including the one to Sri Lanka credited with carrying the Pali canon there. 3
Learn More
Ashoka's Council and the Missions

The Theravada chronicles place this council at Pataliputta in the reign of Ashoka, and the problem it addressed was a consequence of imperial patronage. Royal favour had made the monastic order prosperous, and men had entered it who were not monks in any serious sense, teaching what they pleased and living on the endowments. The tradition says the order could not hold the fortnightly recitation of the rule for years because agreement could not be reached.

Ashoka is said to have sought out the elder Moggaliputta Tissa, who examined the community, expelled those whose views fell outside the teaching, and presided over a recitation of the canon. The Kathavatthu, the Points of Controversy, is attributed to him and to this occasion: a text that sets out and refutes the positions of other schools, and so records what those schools held.

The consequence the chronicles emphasise most is missionary. Nine missions are said to have been sent out after the council, to the Himalayan region, to Gandhara, to the Greek kingdoms of the northwest, to southern India and to Sri Lanka, the last led by Ashoka's son Mahinda. The transmission of the Pali canon to Sri Lanka is the single most consequential of these for the atlas, since the manuscript tradition that preserved the earliest surviving complete Buddhist canon descends from it.

A Council Only One School Records

This council presents a source problem sharper than that of the first. It appears in the Theravada chronicles of Sri Lanka and in commentarial literature of the same tradition, and it is essentially absent from the records of the other early schools, which describe their own councils differently or not at all. A council of the whole order that half the order does not remember is a difficult object.

Ashoka's own inscriptions do not describe it. What they do contain is a short edict, found at three sites, warning that any monk or nun who divides the order will be made to wear white and put out of the monastery, which shows that the emperor concerned himself with monastic discipline and that schism was a live problem in his reign. That is real contemporary evidence for the situation the council story addresses, without being evidence for the council.

The most economical reading, and the one many scholars adopt, is that a school council of the Theravada lineage has been remembered as a general one, and that its account was shaped to establish that lineage as the orthodox continuation. That is not a charge of invention. It is how traditions ordinarily remember. The atlas holds the entry because the event is foundational to Theravada self-understanding and to the transmission of the Pali canon, and marks the disputed points as disputed rather than presenting one school's chronicle as the record of all.

Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Ashoka, Historical Figures

Why this is disputed. The Sri Lankan chronicle tradition places the council at Pataliputra under Ashoka's patronage. No such council appears in his own edicts, and its historicity is disputed. The council appears only in the Theravada chronicle tradition, the Dipavamsa and Mahavamsa, and is unknown to non Theravada schools, leading some historians to read it as a sectarian foundation narrative rather than a pan Buddhist historical event.

Source The Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr.

Belongs to Tradition

Buddhism, Religions

Held Differently

Mahayana, Denominations

The northern traditions preserve a different account of the councils of this period and do not number Pataliputra among them. Where the Pali chronicles give a council that vindicated one school, the northern sources give a history of schism that this council does not resolve.

Element Of

The council at Pataliputra under Ashoka is the Theravada foundation narrative. The Mahavamsa presents it as the purification that fixed the school own canon and sent the mission to Sri Lanka.

Related To

The council and the missions that followed it are placed by Theravada sources under Ashoka's patronage.

Source Asoka and the Decline of the MauryasRomila Thapar

Both councils function in the Theravada account as guarantors of the canon and the discipline.

Sources
1. The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism
Robert E. Buswell Jr. and Donald S. Lopez Jr., Princeton University Press, 2014View the Source
2. Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas
Romila Thapar, Oxford University Press, 1961
3. Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo
Richard Gombrich, Routledge, 2006View the Source
4. An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices, 2nd edition
Peter Harvey, Cambridge University Press, 2013View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.