Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Emptiness and Omnipresence: An Essential Introduction to Tiantai Buddhism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Brook Ziporyn is a scholar of Chinese Buddhist philosophy, and this book, published by Indiana University Press, is an academic introduction to Tiantai Buddhism's distinctive philosophical concept of emptiness and omnipresence, working from the school's own classical Chinese textual sources. Its strength is that Ziporyn specializes specifically in Tiantai thought and its difficult technical philosophical vocabulary, giving the introduction real depth rather than treating Tiantai as a minor variant of more commonly discussed Chinese Buddhist schools. Its limit is that it is written as a philosophical introduction assuming some background in Buddhist thought generally, so a reader new to Buddhist philosophy overall may find it demanding as a first exposure to the tradition, though its explanations of Tiantai specifically are considered clear by specialists.

Facts
Citation
Author
Brook Ziporyn
Publisher
Indiana University Press
Publication Year
2016
URL
https://archive.org/details/emptinessomnipre0000zipo
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Brook Ziporyn's scholarly introduction to Tiantai Buddhist philosophy, focused on its doctrine of the interpenetration of all phenomena, published by Indiana University Press.
Notes
Scholarly introduction to Tiantai Buddhist philosophy, focused on its distinctive doctrine of the interpenetration of all phenomena. Use for established facts about Tiantai doctrine as this study presents it.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Tiantai, Denominations

This source names Tiantai directly: "Press, is an academic introduction to Tiantai Buddhism's distinctive philosophical concept of emptiness and omnipresence, working from the school's own classical Chinese textual sources."

Claims Backed By This Source (92 claims)

This source backs 92 claims across the atlas. As facts: 45 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 27 holds, 3 connected. Plus 16 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 21 claims: 14 well-attested, 3 connected, 4 general references.
  • Denominations, 20 claims: 2 well-attested, 16 holds, 2 general references.
  • Doctrines, 17 claims: 6 well-attested, 6 holds, 5 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 15 claims: 12 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.