Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Final Report of the Examining Committees for the Yehoash Inscription and James Ossuary

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Final Report of the Examining Committees for the Yehoash Inscription and James Ossuary, issued by the Israel Antiquities Authority in 2003, is the official conclusion of the government committees empanelled to examine both artifacts, finding that the second, later-added portion of the ossuary's inscription is a modern forgery, a position the IAA maintained through the subsequent criminal trial. Its authority rests on the IAA's statutory role as Israel's antiquities authority and on the technical examination its committees conducted. It concerns the inscription's authenticity specifically, not the ossuary object's own age, which independent analyses have treated as a separate question.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Final Report of the Examining Committees for the Yehoash Inscription and James Ossuary, issued by the Israel Antiquities Authority in 2003, the top tier reflecting the official conclusion of government committees empanelled to examine both artifacts, resting on the IAA's statutory role as Israel's antiquities authority and on the technical examination its committees conducted. It concerns the inscription's authenticity specifically, not the ossuary object's own age, which independent analyses have treated as a separate question.
Notes
The 2003 IAA committees concluded the second part of the ossuary inscription is a modern forgery, a position the IAA maintained after the trial.
Citation
Author
Israel Antiquities Authority
Publisher
Israel Antiquities Authority
Publication Year
2003
URL
https://www.bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/IAA_Report
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Israel, Countries

This source names Israel directly: "and James Ossuary, issued by the Israel Antiquities Authority in 2003, is the official conclusion of the government committees empanelled to examine both artifacts, finding that the second..."

Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 2 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.