Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors: The Folk Religion of a Taiwanese Village

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

David K. Jordan's Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors, The Folk Religion of a Taiwanese Village, published by the University of California Press in 1972, is a classic ethnography of mid twentieth century Taiwanese folk religion, examining the tripartite classification of gods, ghosts and ancestors that structures household and village religious practice, household ancestor-tablet ritual, and villagers' own divination methods, based on Jordan's own fieldwork in a single Taiwanese village. Its strength is direct, sustained ethnographic fieldwork and its standing as a widely cited foundational text in the anthropology of Chinese folk religion. Its limit is that it is a single village study from a specific historical moment now more than fifty years past, so a claim generalising its findings to Chinese or Taiwanese folk religion broadly, or to contemporary practice, needs a more recent or more geographically extensive source alongside it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
David K. Jordan's Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors, published by the University of California Press in 1972, is a classic ethnography grounded in Jordan's own fieldwork in a single Taiwanese village, treated at the top tier as a widely cited foundational text.
Notes
Classic ethnography of a mid twentieth century Taiwanese village's folk religion: gods, ghosts and the family dead who become either, household ancestor-tablet ritual, and villagers' own methods of divination.
Citation
Author
David K. Jordan
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
1972
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (38 claims)

This source backs 38 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 17 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
  • Religious Organization & Structure, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Religious Offices, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.