The second volume of Joseph Fitzmyer's two volume Anchor Bible commentary on the Gospel of Luke, covering chapters ten through twenty four, including Luke 17:21's entos hymon and the Passover preparation scene of chapter 22. A standard critical commentary by a leading Catholic biblical scholar, widely cited in subsequent Lukan scholarship. Strong for the Greek text, translation options and the historical-critical reading of both passages; it argues, and is cited here for, the reading of entos hymon as a claim about the kingdom's presence rather than an individual's interior state.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Joseph Fitzmyer's Anchor Bible commentary, published by Doubleday, is a standard critical commentary by a leading Catholic biblical scholar widely cited in subsequent Lukan scholarship, treated at the top tier as rigorous historical-critical academic scholarship. NotesA standard, widely cited critical commentary, checked via its publisher record. Use for the Greek text and the critical reading of both Luke 17:21 and Luke 22:10; the interior reading it argues against is sourced separately, to the Gospel of Thomas, Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, Eckhart, Teresa of Avila, the Quaker Inner Light and Tolstoy's own primary material, all documented elsewhere on the atlas.
Citation
AuthorJoseph A. Fitzmyer
PublisherDoubleday and Company, Garden City, New York (The Anchor Bible, vol. 28A)
Publication Year1985
URLhttps://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300139815/the-gospel-according-to-luke-x-xxiv/
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (26 claims)
This source backs 26 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scripture Portions, 18 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 4 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.