Home›Sources›When India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of BooksSourcesWhen India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of BookssourceCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "When India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of Books." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/household-gods-mahavidyas-nybooks-review.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). When India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of Books. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/household-gods-mahavidyas-nybooks-reviewCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-when-india-reinvented-prints-new-york-re, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {When India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of Books}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/household-gods-mahavidyas-nybooks-review}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXA New York Review of Books article by Andrew Raftery reviewing the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston's exhibition of Indian devotional prints, describing the Calcutta Art Studio's "five prints of the Tantric goddesses, Dasa Mahavidyas, circa 1895", each sheet showing two goddesses in discrete fields rendered through layered chromolithography.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (22 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsCitationAuthorWell-attestedAndrew RafteryPublisherWell-attestedThe New York Review of BooksPublication YearWell-attested2026Source TypeWell-attestedmagazine featureAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested2Tier two: an editorially reviewed magazine essay on an art exhibition, used here to independently corroborate the Met's own catalogue account of the five-diptych series structure and its circa-1895 dating.Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSacred Art & Iconography, 16 claims: 12 well-attested, 4 general references.Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.Well-attested18Sacred Art & IconographyDiptych of Bhuvaneshvari and Bagala (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Kali and Tara (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Kamala and Bhairavi (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Shorhasi and Chinnamosta (Calcutta Art Studio)SourcesWhen India Reinvented Prints, New York Review of BooksGeneral References4Sacred Art & IconographyDiptych of Bhuvaneshvari and Bagala (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Kali and Tara (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Kamala and Bhairavi (Calcutta Art Studio)Diptych of Shorhasi and Chinnamosta (Calcutta Art Studio)Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year