Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Simon Martin and Nikolai Grube, Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens

Thames and Hudson

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Simon Martin and Nikolai Grube's Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens, now in its second edition, is the standard synthesis of Classic Maya dynastic history, reconstructing city by city sequences of rulers, their reigns and their recorded political and ritual acts from the hieroglyphic monuments the rulers themselves commissioned. Its account of Yaxchilan draws on the site's own lintels and stelae, cross checked against the wider corpus of deciphered Maya inscriptions, to establish dates, names and relationships that individual monuments alone leave incomplete.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Tier 1: an academic synthesis by two leading Maya epigraphers, cross checked against the primary hieroglyphic corpus rather than a single monument or site.
Notes
Standard academic reference for Classic Maya political and dynastic history, used here for the reign dates, dynastic relationships and monument context of Yaxchilan, Itzamnaaj Bahlam III and Lady Xoc. Tier 1, a peer reputable academic synthesis by two leading epigraphers, cross referencing primary hieroglyphic monuments against the wider deciphered corpus rather than relying on a single source.
Citation
Author
Simon Martin and Nikolai Grube
Publisher
Thames and Hudson
Publication Year
2008
Source Type
Book (secondary)
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Classic Maya directly: "edition, is the standard synthesis of Classic Maya dynastic history, reconstructing city by city sequences of rulers, their reigns and their recorded political and ritual acts from the hieroglyphic..."

Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 26 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 19 claims: 13 well-attested, 4 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.