Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Poisons of the Past: Molds, Epidemics, and History

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Mary Kilbourne Matossian's Poisons of the Past, Molds, Epidemics, and History, published by Yale University Press in 1989, proposes ergot poisoning as a contributing cause behind several historical episodes of mass affliction, including the 1692 Salem witchcraft accusations. Its authority rests on standard academic peer review at a major university press and on Matossian's serious engagement with agricultural and climate history. Its limit, and it is a real one, is that historians specializing in the Salem episode have largely rejected the ergotism explanation on documentary grounds, finding the symptom pattern and timeline a poor match for the accusations' actual social and legal record. Cite the book for its serious argument about ergot's broader historical effects, and treat its specific application to Salem as a contested hypothesis most Salem specialists do not accept, not as an established cause.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Mary Kilbourne Matossian's Poisons of the Past, published by Yale University Press in 1989, proposes ergot poisoning as a contributing cause behind the 1692 Salem witchcraft accusations, the lower tier reflecting that historians specializing in the Salem episode have largely rejected the ergotism explanation on documentary grounds, notwithstanding standard academic peer review at a major university press and Matossian's serious engagement with agricultural and climate history.
Notes
Proposes ergotism as a cause behind several historical episodes of mass affliction, including the Salem accusations. Tier 3: an influential hypothesis that historians of Salem have largely rejected on documentary grounds. Cited as a claim about ergot, clearly marked as contested.
Citation
Author
Mary Kilbourne Matossian
Publisher
Yale University Press
Publication Year
1989
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Plants, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Plants

General References

1

Plants

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.