Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Case Study 53: Institutional Review of Yeshiva/h, Findings Report

Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse's own findings report into Case Study 53, an institutional review of Yeshiva Bondi and Yeshivah Melbourne's current child protection policies and procedures, held as a follow up to Case Study 22's 2015 hearing. The Commission held a public hearing on 23 March 2017 examining what the two institutions had put in place since. The Commission's own record states that Yeshivah Melbourne had taken steps including drafting formal child protection policies and providing training to children, parents and staff.

Facts
Citation
Author
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
Publisher
Commonwealth of Australia
Publication Year
2017
URL
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-53-institutional-review-yeshivah
Source Type
Government commissioned report
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Tier 1: the same royal commission this atlas already cites at tier 1 for its Case Study 22 findings report and its final report, here at the Case Study 53 follow up review document.
Sources
Case Study 53: Institutional Review of Yeshiva/h, Findings Report
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Commonwealth of Australia, 2017View the Source
Claims Backed By This Source (9 claims)

This source backs 9 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Denominations, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

General References

1

Denominations

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.