Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Saint Anselm (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is Thomas Williams's Saint Anselm entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a continuously revised, peer reviewed reference work rather than a fixed edition monograph, each entry assigned to a subject specialist and checked by a subject editor before publication, then revisable as scholarship moves. Williams is a recognised Anselm scholar with his own translations of Anselm's works in print, so the entry carries the standing of an expert synthesis rather than an anonymous survey. Its strength is exactly that peer editorial process together with public correction over time. Its limit is that an encyclopedia entry compresses a large secondary literature into a summary, so a claim resting on a specific contested reading of the ontological argument or of Cur Deus Homo should be checked against Williams's own cited primary and secondary sources rather than treated as the entry's final word.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Thomas Williams's Saint Anselm entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, continuously revised under the encyclopedia's own editorial board, is an authored and reviewed reference rather than independent peer-reviewed monograph scholarship, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Thomas Williams's Saint Anselm entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference, not a fixed-edition monograph.
Citation
Author
Thomas Williams
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/anselm/
Source Type
reference
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Anselm of Canterbury directly: "This is Thomas Williams's Saint Anselm entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a continuously revised, peer reviewed reference work rather than a fixed edition monograph, each entry..."

Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Figures, 11 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Denominations, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Philosophical Schools, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.