This is not a separate work: it is UNESCO's own World Heritage List inscription for the Stone Circles of Senegambia, one entry in the same continuously maintained official register this atlas also records as a general source. It descends from that register rather than standing beside it, so citing this entry alongside the general World Heritage List record, or alongside another of its entries, is one institutional voice, not corroboration. Its real limit is the register's own limit: an official designation record produced by the World Heritage Committee for the purpose of recognition and protection, not a scholarly history of the site or the traditions associated with it. Use it for this site's World Heritage status, inscription year and the criteria under which it was listed; a claim about its deeper history needs a dedicated historical or archaeological source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
This is UNESCO's own World Heritage List inscription for the Stone Circles of Senegambia, an official designation record from the World Heritage Committee, treated at the top tier for that institutional designation, notwithstanding that a claim about the site's deeper history needs a dedicated historical or archaeological source. NotesUNESCO's own World Heritage List entry for the Stone Circles of Senegambia (inscribed 2006); an official heritage-designation record, not a scholarly archaeological study.
Citation
AuthorUNESCO World Heritage Committee
PublisherUNESCO
Publication Year2006
URLhttps://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1226/
Source TypeHeritage body
Cross-Tradition Connections
Derived From
This record's own Title names the UNESCO World Heritage List as the register it is entered under, and its Author names the World Heritage Centre, the World Heritage Committee, or UNESCO itself rather than an individual scholar; one entry inside that same continuously maintained official register, not a witness independent of it.
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 2 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 connected.
- Religions, 2 claims: 1 open question, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.