Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Ahmed El Shamsy's history traces a specific, documented historical process, how Islamic legal methodology and the Sunni madhabs actually became canonized, working from the historical record of hadith collection, ijma and qiyas as institutions developed rather than treating the schools as having existed in fixed form from the outset. That process-tracing method, showing change over documented time, is the book's real evidentiary contribution. This record has not independently traced further scholarly response to El Shamsy's specific historical argument since 2013. Use it for the documented historical formation of Sunni legal theory and the schools' doctrinal positions; a claim about current legal practice within a school needs a separate contemporary source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Ahmed El Shamsy's scholarly history of how Islamic legal methodology and the Sunni schools of law became canonized, covering hadith, ijma and qiyas as sources of law, published by Cambridge University Press; a critical academic history, not a devotional manual of fiqh.
Notes
Ahmed El Shamsy's scholarly history of how Islamic legal methodology and the Sunni schools of law (madhabs) became canonized, covering the sources of law such as hadith, ijma and qiyas. Use for established historical facts about the formation of Sunni legal theory and the schools' doctrinal positions on the sources of law; a critical academic history, not a devotional or practitioner's manual of fiqh.
Citation
Author
Ahmed El Shamsy
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
2013
URL
https://archive.org/details/canonizationofis0000elsh
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Sunni, Denominations

This source names Sunni directly: "how Islamic legal methodology and the Sunni madhabs actually became canonized, working from the historical record of hadith collection, ijma and qiyas as institutions developed rather than treating..."

Claims Backed By This Source (97 claims)

This source backs 97 claims across the atlas. As facts: 37 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 33 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 held Differently. Plus 24 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Schools of Religious Law, 30 claims: 5 well-attested, 19 holds, 1 held Differently, 5 general references.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 15 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 6 general references.
  • Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Doctrines, 12 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 5 general references.
  • Denominations, 10 claims: 9 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Organization & Structure, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.

Critiqued Here

1

Held Differently

1

Schools of Religious Law

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.