This is the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris and the Archdiocese of Paris's own custodial record for the Crown of Thorns and the cathedral treasury, covering the relic's custody, its veneration schedule and its relocation following the 2019 fire and the cathedral's 2024 reopening. As the custodian's own standing record it is authoritative for those custody and veneration facts. Its limit is that it is the holding institution's own devotional account, not an independent scholarly study, so a claim that the circlet is physically the crown of the Passion, rather than a venerated relic of disputed first-century origin, needs a source outside the cathedral's own custodial page.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
This is the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris and the Archdiocese of Paris's own custodial record, the holding institution's own devotional account rather than an independent scholarly study, hence the middle tier. NotesNotre-Dame de Paris and the Archdiocese of Paris's own custodial record for the Crown of Thorns and the cathedral treasury; a standing institutional record, not a scholarly publication, good for provenance and custody facts, not for the relic's own history or authenticity.
Custodian
Custodian SourceYes
Custodian BodyCathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris (Archdiocese of Paris)
Custodian BasisThe cathedral and diocese that hold and venerate the Crown of Thorns; authoritative for the relic's custody, veneration schedule and post-fire relocation, not for claims that the circlet is the physical crown of the Passion.
Citation
PublisherCathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris / Archdiocese of Paris
Publication Year2024
URLhttps://www.notredamedeparis.fr/en/
Source Typecustodian record
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Paris, Cities This source names Paris directly: "This is the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris and the Archdiocese of Paris's own custodial record for the Crown of Thorns and the cathedral treasury, covering the relic's custody, its veneration..."
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)
This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 11 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Sacred Sites, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.