United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians is the 1980 United States Supreme Court decision holding that the federal government's 1877 seizure of the Black Hills from the Lakota violated the Fifth Amendment and awarding monetary compensation with interest. As the Court's own official opinion it is the correct primary legal source for what the ruling actually held, in the Court's own reasoning, rather than a secondhand summary. Its limit is that it documents only the legal and monetary resolution the Court reached, the award the Lakota have consistently declined to accept, seeking return of the land itself rather than payment. A claim about the Lakota's own continuing position on the Black Hills, as distinct from the Court's ruling, needs a source representing that ongoing position directly.
Facts
Citation
AuthorSupreme Court of the United States
Publication Year1980
URLhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/371/
Source Typelegal
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A published opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, the primary legal record of the case itself rather than commentary on it, the strongest possible provenance for a legal citation. NotesThe award the Lakota have declined to accept.
Claims Backed By This Source (36 claims)
This source backs 36 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Deities, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- States & Territories, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Subcategories, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Wars & Conflicts, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Cultures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
- Religions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.