The crowd sourced encyclopedia's article on the film, read directly for this entry. Its strength is a well referenced summary of production credits, cast, premiere and release history, and a reception section built around the Parsi community's objection to the film's portrayal of Zarathustra as a philosopher rather than a divine being, citing contemporary press and a religious authority journal. Its limit is that it is not independently peer reviewed, so it is cited here for corroborated factual detail rather than for interpretation.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Wikipedia's article on On Wings of Fire is a crowd sourced tertiary encyclopedic source, hence the lower tier, though useful here for its production record and its reception section citing contemporary press on the Parsi community's objection to the film. NotesRead directly during research; cited for director, writer, producer, cast, runtime, production company, premiere date and the Parsi community reception record it draws from India Today and Parsiana.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Wings_of_Fire
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Zarathustra directly: "objection to the film's portrayal of Zarathustra as a philosopher rather than a divine being, citing contemporary press and a religious authority journal."
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Screen Works, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.