Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Perpetua and Felicity (Wikipedia)

source

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua, Felicitas, Revocatus, Saturninus and Saturus from the Menologion of Basil II (c. AD 1000)," an early Byzantine illuminated service book.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier three: a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, matching this atlas's established convention for a Wikipedia citation. The source that names Perpetua, Felicity and the illumination's manuscript together; corroborated on the object's date, holding library and illuminators by the Wikimedia Commons file record, which gives the fifth martyr's name differently.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetua_and_Felicity
Source Type
encyclopedia
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Carthage, Cities

This source names Carthage directly: "Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua, Felicitas, Revocatus, Saturninus and Saturus from..."

This source names Felicity directly: "A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua..."

This source names Perpetua directly: "A Wikipedia article on Perpetua and Felicity, Christian martyrs executed together at Carthage in 203 CE, naming and reproducing a manuscript illumination captioned "The martyrdom of Perpetua..."

Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)

This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.